National Federation of Indian Women Approaches Supreme Court For Immediate Implementation Of Women's Reservation
The Supreme Court on Thursday (January 25) heard the National Federation of Indian Women's (NFIW) plea challenging the 'delimitation clause' of the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, which proposes to introduce women's reservation in the Lok Sabha, the upper houses of the state legislatures, and the Delhi legislative assembly. Although the constitutional amendment...
The Supreme Court on Thursday (January 25) heard the National Federation of Indian Women's (NFIW) plea challenging the 'delimitation clause' of the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, which proposes to introduce women's reservation in the Lok Sabha, the upper houses of the state legislatures, and the Delhi legislative assembly. Although the constitutional amendment was signed into law by President Droupadi Murmu in September, the act will not be implemented until a delimitation exercise is conducted following the next census.
The public interest litigation (PIL) petition was heard today by bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Dipankar Datta and Prasanna B Varale. A similar writ petition has also been filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur, claiming that a constitutional amendment, once passed with overwhelming support in a special session called for the purpose, cannot be withheld. In November last year, the court, while hearing Thakur's petition, expressed its reservations about directing the union government to immediately implement this constitutional amendment before the 2024 general elections.
The apex court was hearing another PIL from 2021 filed by the National Federation of Indian Women. In this plea, the organisation has sought the reintroduction of the women's reservation bill, which, despite being passed by the Rajya Sabha in 2010, lapsed after the dissolution of 15th Lok Sabha since it was not tabled in the lower house. One month before the the union cabinet approved the tabling of the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-eighth Amendment) Bill, 2023, the Justice Khanna-led bench had pulled up the central government for not making its stand clear on the issue of women's reservation, asking why it had not filed a response to NFIW's public interest litigation petition.
While refusing to issue notice in Thakur's petition seeking the immediate introduction of women's quota, the top court agreed to hear it with NFIW's 2021 plea. It has also directed another writ petition seeking the implementation of the 33 percent quota for women lawmakers to be heard along with these, in order to avoid multiplicity of litigation. In the latest development, the National Federation of Indian Women withdrew its earlier writ petition and filed the latest plea challenging the delimitation clause of the constitutional amendment.
During today's hearing, the bench summarily directed this plea to also be tagged along with the batch of petitions on the subject of the immediate introduction of one-third women's quota.
Background
On September 29, President of India Droupadi Murmu gave her assent to the women's reservation bill that passed both houses of parliament with broad bipartisan support earlier that month. The Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023 – which will come into effect after a delimitation exercise is conducted following the next census – seeks to reserve one-third of seats for women in the Lok Sabha, the upper houses of the state legislatures, and the Delhi legislative assembly. Not only this, the act also introduces horizontal reservation for women from scheduled castes (SC) and scheduled tribes (ST) within the women's quota.
The amendment act has modified one constitutional provision, i.e., Article 239AA (special provisions with respect to Delhi), and inserted three new articles namely Articles 330A, 332A, and 334A – the first two seeking to introduce 33 per cent reservation in Lok Sabha and the state legislative assemblies respectively. Article 334A contains a sunset clause declaring that this affirmative action policy will come to an end after 15 years. Not only this, but the article also clarifies that women's reservation will be granted only after an exercise of delimitation is undertaken for the purpose following the first census after the enactment of the act.
During the debate in the two houses on the women's reservation bill, opposition leaders, even while broadly supporting the legislation, questioned the clause that sought to defer its implementation and urged the union government to dispense with the requirement of conducting a census and a delimitation exercise first. Last month, Congress leader Dr Jaya Thakur also filed a public interest litigation praying for a declaration that this clog was 'void-ab initio' and seeking the immediate implementation of the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023.
Case Details
National Federation of Women v. Union of India | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 41 of 2024