[Breaking] SC Stays Orissa HC Order On Mandatory COVID-19 Testing For Migrants To Enter Odisha

Update: 2020-05-08 10:49 GMT
story

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the order passed by the Orissa High Court on Thursday which directed that migrant workers should be allowed entry to Odisha only after testing negative for COVID-19. A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, S K Kaul and B R Gavai stayed the order on a mentioning made by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.The Ministry of Home Affairs filed an urgent Special...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the order passed by the Orissa High Court on Thursday which directed that migrant workers should be allowed entry to Odisha only after testing negative for COVID-19.

A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, S K Kaul and B R Gavai stayed the order on a mentioning made by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.

The Ministry of Home Affairs filed an urgent Special Leave Petition stating that the HC direction was "unworkable"

"The impugned order creates an unreasonable and impossible pre-condition on the part of governments and the migrant workers who wish to travel back to their places", stated the Centre in the SC.

The Centre also pointed out that the petitioner before the HC had not sought for such a direction as well.

In HC, a bench comprising Justices S Panda and K R Mohapatra passed the order while hearing a petition filed by one Narayan Chandra Jena against the return of migrants.

The bench in its order said "the state government should ensure that all migrants who are in queue to come to Orissa should be tested negative of COVID 19 before boarding the conveyance."

As per the Standard Operating Procedure formulated by the Centre on April 29 on the inter-state movement of stranded migrants, only persons without visible COVID-19 symptoms are allowed to proceed.

In the SLP, it was argued that the HC order completely ignored the SOP of the Centre, and "impinged upon the executive domain".

The impugned order ignores the "gradual strategy" of the Executive in dealing with the issue, stated the Centre.

Tags:    

Similar News