Justice Khanna: I'm on as far as the money in Goa is concerned. He has not got the possession, somebody else has. It's not acquisition by him, it is acquisition by someone else. Use is by someone else. Projecting is by someone else.
Justice Khanna: I'm on as far as the money in Goa is concerned. He has not got the possession, somebody else has. It's not acquisition by him, it is acquisition by someone else. Use is by someone else. Projecting is by someone else.
It may be noted that the bench is currently enquiring about the PMLA case, not the CBI case.
Justice Khanna: So till the proceeds of crime come, the PMLA case doesn't come.
Justice Khanna: It's not a case of attempt according to you. According to you, your case falls under actual involvement...what is the activity connected with the proceeds of crime? This is not generation. PMLA deals with process or activity connected with proceeds of crime.
Justice Khanna: The money is not going to him. In case it is a company with whom he is involved, then we have vicarious liability. Otherwise the prosecution falters. Money laundering is entirely a different offence...
Justice Khanna: The money is not going to him. In case it is a company with whom he is involved, then we have vicarious liability. Otherwise the prosecution falters. Money laundering is entirely a different offence...
Justice Khanna: The money is not going to him. In case it is a company with whom he is involved, then we have vicarious liability. Otherwise the prosecution falters. Money laundering is entirely a different offence...
Justice Khanna: Manish Sisodia is not involved in all this. Vijay Nair is there but Manish Sisodia is not in this part. How will you bring him under money laundering act?
Justice Khanna: You have to establish a chain. The money has to flow from the liquor lobby to the person. We agree with you that it's difficult to establish the chain because everything is done under cover. But that's where your competence comes in