Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 8)- LIVE UPDATES

Update: 2022-02-22 08:37 GMT
Live Updates - Page 5
2022-02-22 10:32 GMT

AG: There was an argument on Article 15. There is no discrimination on grounds of religion. These are bald allegations without any substance and we deny them.

2022-02-22 10:31 GMT

AG: A right cannot be exercised in islotation in public spaces. Institutional discipline is paramount.

In military service somebody had sought enforcement of individual rights. This was for growing of a beard. The court negatived.

2022-02-22 10:29 GMT

AG refers to privacy judgment: "The notion that there must exist a reasonable expectation of privacy ensures that while on one hand, individual has a protected zone of privacy, yet on the other, exercise of individual choices is subject to rights of others to lead orderly lives"

2022-02-22 10:27 GMT

AG: I will repeat. There is no prohibition of hijab anywhere. But it cannot be compulsory, it should be left to the choice of the women concerned.

2022-02-22 10:26 GMT

AG : Dignity involves liberty; liberty involves choice. The entire submission of petitioners is based on compulsion.The entire claim of petition is to make compulsion, it goes against fundamental ethos of constitution.

2022-02-22 10:26 GMT

...the fundamental duties of every citizen.We cannot adopt an interpretation of the Constitution which has such an effect. Our inability to state this as a matter of constitutional doctrine is liable to lead us to positions of pretence or, worse still, hypocrisy"

2022-02-22 10:25 GMT

AG continues quoting J Chandrachud from Sabarimala judgment :

"To treat women as children of a lesser god is to blink at the Constitution itself....To allow practices derogatory to the dignity of a woman in matters of faith & worship would permit a conscious breach of

2022-02-22 10:24 GMT

"...India’s unwavering commitment to a constitutional order based on human. Practices which are destructive of liberty & those which make some citizens less equal than others can simply not be countenanced"

2022-02-22 10:24 GMT

AG refers to a paragraph from J Chandrachud's judgment in Sabarimala case:

"Once individual dignity assumes the character of a shining star in the constellation of fundamental rights, the place of religion in public places must be conditioned by

2022-02-22 10:22 GMT

AG : Kindly keep my submission that woman cannot be subjected to a compulsion of a dress in the context of their submissions.

Tags:    

Similar News