Chandrababu Naidu's Plea Against FIR & Remand : Andhra Pradesh High Court Reserves Verdict [Live Updates]

Salve interjects: Please turn to section 17A. I was almost surprised to hear that this doesn't relate to decisions or recommendations made...

Kumar reads:

"to exercise powers under Section 482 CrPC, the complaint in its entirety shall have to be examined on the basis of the allegation and High Court not under obligation to examine its correctness."

Kumar refers to Priti Saraf Vs. State Of NCT Of Delhi

Kumar reading from Case diary- there is no verification. And these are amounts given in 2015-2016 (prior to 2018 PCA Amendment)

Kumar: Everything that was required to happen has not happened. And in the counter how the financial notices were overruled have been mentioned in a chart form

Kumar: In Section 161 statement, the accused have taken a stand that the agreement was placed before them to merely sign

Kumar: Govt Order and agreement are also not consistent

Kumar: None of the documents have any dates, neither the proposal nor the agreement

Kumar: One month after the execution of MoA for sub-contractor and having no previous agreement, Skillar was incorporated. Design tech has shown 178 crores purchases from Skillar.

Kumar: Forensic audit was conducted. Report submitted showing that design tech diverted funds of over 200 crores. Also, there was no date on the agreement.