Aligarh Muslim University Minority Status : Live Updates From Supreme Court Hearing [Day 2]

Update: 2024-01-10 04:53 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
trueasdfstory

A 7-judge bench of the Supreme Court is hearing today the case relating to the minority status of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU).The bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra and Satish Chandra Sharma will hear the issue.The bench, among other things, will consider whether minority status can be...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

A 7-judge bench of the Supreme Court is hearing today the case relating to the minority status of the Aligarh Muslim University (AMU).

The bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra and Satish Chandra Sharma will hear the issue.

The bench, among other things, will consider whether minority status can be given only if the institute is established by a minority. The matter was referred to a 7-judge bench in 2019. For a detailed reading on the reference, read this article. The report of the first day's hearing can be read here.

Follow this page for live updates.



Live Updates
2024-01-10 10:49 GMT

CJI : gives one page of set of submissions  

The hearing for the day concludes 

#AMU #SupremeCourt #minoritystatus #minorityeducation

2024-01-10 10:48 GMT

Sibal refers to para 18 of TMA Pai 


" 18. With regard to the establishment of educational institutions, three Articles of the Constitution come into play. Article 19(1)(g) gives the right to all the citizens to practice any profession or to carry on any occupation, trade or business; this right is subject to restrictions that may be placed under Article 19(6)... Article 19(1)(g) and Article 26, therefore, confer rights on all citizens and religious denominations to establish and maintain educational institutions. There was no serious dispute that the majority community as well as linguistic and religious minorities would have a right under Article 19(1)(g) and 26 to establish educational institutions. In addition, Article 30(1), in no uncertain terms, gives the right to the religious and linguistic minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice." 


#AMU #SupremeCourt

2024-01-10 10:47 GMT

Sibal refers to written submissions on the correlation between Article 19(6) and 30 of the Constitution 


2024-01-10 10:38 GMT

Sibal : 1981 amendent is a Parliamentary statute, can the govt. ever make a submission to the court contrary to the parliamentary statute even if it is declared to be void? executive cannot go against parliamentary statute even if it is struck down...they are struck down every day in the HCs can the govt say I will go against the statute? this is for the first time it has arisen my lords 

2024-01-10 10:27 GMT

J Khanna : What you are really saying is that the object and purpose have to be taken into consideration when we interpret the word 'establishment'

Sibal : the genesis of why it's done

J Khanna : legal establishment has to be in terms of law...

Sibal : it is not the statutory recognition, which is the heart of establishment... Basha loses sight of all this completely  

2024-01-10 10:23 GMT

Sibal : I'll tell you the mistake made by the petitioners in the Basha case, when they found that the judge was not agreeable to the fact that it was established by Muslim community, they started arguing that it doesn't matter, even if not established, it was administered which is contrary to 30. so my lords , the reference you will find is therefore established or administered, why because they argued that I am a minority even they don't find I have established but I administer. AMU was there before the court. Thats why that reference was made to that 'or' 

2024-01-10 10:19 GMT

Sibal : I stand here for the diversity of the constitutional ethos of this country, I plead your Lordship don't allow it to be destroyed, no such thing as one size fits all especially in the field of education.

Sibal : the statute is the end product of the establishment process, we start on the ground, that is why the establishment process is important

2024-01-10 10:11 GMT

Sibal : there is disjunct, complete disjunct in the concept of establishment and the concept of recognition, recognition is for the purposes of being a part of the workforce of the community; establishment is for the purpose of ensuring that people of your community can be part of the workforce, its a vehicle for empowerment not a vehicle for destroying the very concept of setting up a minority institution.

2024-01-10 10:05 GMT

Sibal : A degree is only a recognition of your attaining a certain academic expertise to be part of the workforce of this country. It has nothing to do with the establishment of the institution. Without out it, it is of no value, no degree is of value

Sibal gave the example of if one wants to establish a minority design institute, the moment I get the status of a University, one will lose the right to establish- therefore I will not be able to serve the community for which I am putting in the money , for which one I have given land 

2024-01-10 09:59 GMT

Sibal refers to the UGC 1964

J SuryaKant : the right to establish a university which is competence to award a degree is restricted in terms of the provisions of the UGC Act not on account of the judgement as such

Sibal : yes mylords my problem is that 1956 was there when Basha was established and Basha then says you could have set up a university and awarded degrees... The UGC recognises the degree it doesn't recognise the establishment, my lords, kindly see the recognition is for the degree

Tags:    

Similar News