Home
Lawyers & Law Firms
NRI Law
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Law Firms
Deal News
Deal News
Law Firm Articles
Law Firm Articles
Foreign Law Firms
Foreign Law Firms
Internships
Internships
Job Updates
Job Updates
Law Firm Events
Law Firm Events
SC Judgments
लाइव लॉ हिंदी
Law Schools
Call for Papers
Call for Papers
Competitions
Competitions
Interviews
Interviews
Law School - Columns
Law School - Columns
Law School Articles
Law School Articles
Moot Courts
Moot Courts
News
News
School Admission
School Admission
Seminars
Seminars
Internships
Internships
Diploma/Certificate...
Diploma/Certificate...
LLM/Phd
LLM/Phd
Law School Admission
Law School Admission
Law School Cover Story
Law School Cover Story
Law School Editors Pick
Law School Editors Pick
Placements
Placements
Scholarships/Fellowships
Scholarships/Fellowships
Top Corner Stories
Top Corner Stories
IBC News
Tax
Arbitration
Events Corner
Sponsored
Close the sidebar
Top Stories
News Updates
Columns
Interviews
Foreign/International
RTI
Know the Law
Law Schools
Law Firms
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Events Corner
Videos
Sponsored
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Round Ups
IBC News
Environmental Law
Cartoons
Tax
Arbitration
Consumer Cases
X
Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Invoice"
Arbitration Clause In Invoices Can Be Binding On Parties When They Acted Upon The Invoices And No Objections Were Raised: Bombay HC
Assessee Not Eligible To Avail CENVAT Credit On Invoices Not In Their Name: CESTAT
Application U/S 9 Of IBC Cannot Be Admitted For Invoices Covered By Prohibited Period U/S 10A Of Code: NCLAT
Mere Arbitration Clause In Invoices Insufficient, Express Or Implicit Acceptance Of Terms Of Invoices Necessary: Delhi High Court
Commission Deducted In Sale Invoice To Foreign Buyer Is Not Chargeable To Service Tax: CESTAT
Non-Mentioning Of Service Tax Registration In Invoice Is Procedural Lapse, Cenvat Credit Can't Be Denied: CESTAT
GST Dept. Can't Compute Penalty Amount On Higher Value Than Invoice Value Without Proper Evidence: Calcutta High Court
Mere Factum Of Two Set Of Invoices Not Sufficient To Prove Charge Of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT
Non-Production Of Original Tax Invoice From Registered Dealer, Reversal Of ITC By Dept. Doesn't Amount To Double Taxation: Madras High Court
Bihar VAT Act | Penalty Imposable U/S 56(4)(B) On Account Of Clerical Mistake In Mentioning Of Invoice Number In Suvidha Form: Patna High Court
Failure To Mention The Manufacturer's Name On The Invoice Is A Significant Lapse In Complying With Trade Practice Standards And Consumer Protection; Ernakulam District Commission
Extended Limitation Cannot Claimed by Department, In Absence Of Fraud, Mis-Statement, Contumacious Conduct Of Taxpayer: CESTAT
Next Page >