Supreme Court Income Tax Settlement Commission's Purpose Is To Give Assessee Chance To Disclose Undisclosed Income To Seek Immunity : Supreme Court Case Title: SHREE NILKANTH DEVELOPERS v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 648 A Division bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing an appeal, discussed the objective and purpose behind...
Supreme Court
Income Tax Settlement Commission's Purpose Is To Give Assessee Chance To Disclose Undisclosed Income To Seek Immunity : Supreme Court
Case Title: SHREE NILKANTH DEVELOPERS v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 648
A Division bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing an appeal, discussed the objective and purpose behind setting up a Settlement Commission under the Income Tax Act 1961.
Excise Duty Exemption | To Determine If A Product Falls Under Description "Intravenous Fluids”, Its Composition & Not Its Use Matters : Supreme Court
Case Title: Commissioner of Central Excise vs M/s Denis Chem Lab Ltd. & Anr.
Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 650
The Supreme Court has ruled that in order to determine whether a product would fall under the description of “Intravenous Fluids” so as to be eligible for exemption from excise duty, it is the composition of the product in question which is relevant and not whether the product is used for treatment of any particular disease.
Interest Income Earned On Deposits By Clubs In Banks Which Are Corporate Members Taxable; Principle Of Mutuality Not Applicable: Supreme Court
Case Title: SECUNDRABAD CLUB ETC. vs C.I.T.-V ETC.
Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 660
The Supreme Court has ruled that the interest income earned on fixed deposits (FDs) made by Clubs in the banks which are members of those Clubs has to be treated like any other income from other sources within the meaning of Section 2(24) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Prashant Kumar Mishra said that the principle of mutuality would not apply to interest income earned on FDs made by Clubs in the banks irrespective of whether the banks are corporate members of the Club or not.
Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court Stays The Income Tax Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Against Oxfam India
Case Title: Oxfam India Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court has stayed the income tax reassessment proceedings initiated against Oxfam India.
Delhi High Court Directs Adjudicating Authority To Process Blackberry’s Claim Of Interest Under Section 11BB Of The Excise Act
Case Title: Blackberry India Pvt Ltd. Versus The Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise And CGST Division
The Delhi High Court has directed the adjudicating authority to process Blackberry’s claim of interest under Section 11BB of the Excise Act.
The Officer Concerned Not Authorized To Administer Oath, No Evidentiary Value: Delhi High Court
Case Title: PCIT Versus ARN Infrastructure Ltd.
The Delhi High Court while upholding the ITAT’s ruling held that the addition of Rs. 10 crore was made purely on the basis of the statement made by directors without corroborative evidence.
Kerala High Court
Classification Of Dr.Reddy’s Senquel-AD As A Mouthwash Or A Medicament: Kerala High Court Remands The Matter Back
Case Title: Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. Versus The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 407
The Kerala High Court has remitted the issue of the classification of Dr.Reddy’s Senquel-AD as a mouthwash or a medicament for fresh consideration.
Jharkhand High Court
Jharkhand High Court Quashes Arbitrary Forfeiture Of Earnest Money By CCL, Orders Release
Case Title: Atibir Industries Company Limited vs. Central Coalfields Limited and Others
Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Jha) 25
The Jharkhand High Court has taken a strong stance against the arbitrary cancellation of a contract and the subsequent forfeiture of earnest money by Central Coalfields Limited, a public sector coal supplier, and declared the forfeiture of earnest money by a public sector coal supplier as "indefensible" and "arbitrary."
Allahabad High Court
Allahabad High Court Imposes 10K Cost On Income Tax Authority For Violation Of Principles Of Natural Justice
Case Title: M/S M.L. Chains v. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 and another 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 263 [Writ Tax No. - 638 of 2022]
Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 263
The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 to be paid by an erring officer of the Income Tax Department for violating the principles of natural justice while cancelling the earlier Assessment Order and initiating fresh proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
E-Way Bill Expired Due To Vehicle Break Down: Allahabad High Court Quashes Seizure Memo
Case Title: M/S Rateria Laminators Pvt. Ltd. vs. Additional Commissioner
The Allahabad High Court has set aside an order under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act 2017 by which a penalty was imposed solely on the ground that no evidence had been adduced regarding the illness of the driver and the breakdown of the vehicle.
Punjab And Haryana High Court
Reusing E-way Bills Demonstrates Intention Of Tax Evasion: Punjab And Haryana High Court Upholds Penalty Against Transporter
Case Title: M/s Bright Road Logistics Versus State of Haryana and Others
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has upheld the penalty against the transporter and ruled that reusing e-way bills demonstrates the intention of tax evasion.
Himachal Pradesh High Court
‘Milk Cream’ Can’t Be Classified As ‘Milk’: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Tax Demand
Case Title: M/s Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd. Versus Additional Excise & Taxation Commissioner and Another
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (HP) 61
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has held that ‘milk cream’ cannot be classified as ‘milk’.
ITAT
Defects In Statement Of Reportable Account Rectified Within The Time Limit: ITAT Deletes Penalty
Case Title: KEB Hana Bank Versus Joint Director of Income Tax
The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the penalty as the defects in the statement of the reportable account were rectified within the time limit.
For Computing Holding Period For Capital Gain The Period To Be Taken From Date Of Allotment Of The Flat: ITAT
Case Title: DCIT Versus Narendra Gehlaut
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that for computing the holding period for capital gain, the period is to be taken from the date of allotment of the flat.
ITAT Allows Capital Gains Exemption To NSE Investor Under India-Mauritius Tax Treaty
Case Title: Saif Ii-Se Investments Mauritius Limited Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed the capital gains exemption to NSE investors under the India-Mauritius tax treaty.
CESTAT
Services For Drain Hole Drilling In The Existing Oil Wells Qualify As “Mining Services”: CESTAT
Case Title: M/s Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Dibrugarh
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that services for drain hole drilling in existing oil wells qualify as "mining services".
Flue Gas Generated During Manufacturing Metallurgical Coke Is Not A Manufactured Product, Tata Steel Not Liable To Pay Excise Duty: CESTAT
Case Title: M/s. Tata Steel Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the flue gas generated during the course of manufacturing metallurgical coke is not a manufactured product and is also not marketable.
No Service Tax Payable On Penal Interest & Cheque Bouncing Charges Received By Bajaj Finance: CESTAT
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)has held that penal interest and cheque bouncing charges received by Bajaj Finance as "consideration" for "tolerating an act" are not leviable to service tax under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994.
No Service Tax Applicable On Providing Repair, Management And Maintenance Of Roads Services To NHAI: CESTAT
Case Title: B. Ramanaiah Constructions Versus Commissioner of Central Excise
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that no service tax is applicable to the repair, management, and maintenance of road services for the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI).
Cenvat Credit Allowable To Nayara Energy On Inputs Used For Railway Lines: CESTAT
Case Title: Nayara Energy Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Ahmedabad-i
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cenvat credit is allowable on inputs used for railway lines.