Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority MahaRERA Orders Builder To Pay Interest To Homebuyers Of Suburbia Estate For Delayed Possession Case – Rakesh Narendra Dhopte Versus Pranay Shingi A/w 3 others Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Mahesh Pathak (Member – I), has directed the builder to pay interest to the homebuyers...
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority
MahaRERA Orders Builder To Pay Interest To Homebuyers Of Suburbia Estate For Delayed Possession
Case – Rakesh Narendra Dhopte Versus Pranay Shingi A/w 3 others
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Mahesh Pathak (Member – I), has directed the builder to pay interest to the homebuyers for the delay in handing over possession of the flat.
Failure To Hand Over In Time, MahaRERA Directs Goel Ganga To Refund Amount To Homebuyer
Case- Dr Anant Bagul Versus Goel Ganga India Pvt Ltd
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Mahesh Pathak (Member – I), has directed the builder Goel Ganga to refund the homebuyer's amount with interest after the builder failed to deliver possession of the flat within the promised timeframe.
MahaRERA Orders Spenta Builders To Pay Interest To Homebuyer For Delay In Handing Over Possession
Case - Ravibhushan Kumar Prasad & another Versus Spenta Builders Private Limited
Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Ajoy Mehta (Chairperson), directed Spenta Builders to pay interest to the homebuyer for the delay in handing over possession of the flat.
Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority
Case – Shreyanshu Pavas Versus Mantri Developers Pvt. Ltd
Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed Mantri Developers, the builder, to pay forty-eight lakh rupees to the homebuyer as interest for the delay in handing over possession of the flat.
Case – Krishnaraj Salian Versus Aashirwad Infra Developers & another
Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Neelmani N Raju (Member), has directed Aashirwad Infra Developers, the builder, to pay interest to the homebuyer, execute the sale agreement, hand over the common area, and form an association of homebuyers.
Case – Amrendra Kumar Singh Versus M/s. Suvilas Realities Private Limited
Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Neelmani N Raju (Member), has directed the builder, Suvilas Realities, to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer to purchase a flat in their project after the builder refused to register the agreement for sale despite receiving more than 10% of the total cost of the flat.
Six Years Delay In Completing Project, Karnataka RERA Orders Sashwati Realty To Refund
Case – Rajiv Kumar Kushwaha & another Versus M/s. Sashwati Realty Pvt Ltd
Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed Sashwati Realty, the builder, to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer to purchase a flat, after the builder failed to complete the project even after a six-year delay.
Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal
Case – Arun M.N. Versus Kathirvelu Thirumaran and Another
Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) bench, comprising Justice M. Duraiswamy (Chairperson) and R. Padmanabhan (Judicial Member), has held that the entitlement of land for homebuyers is not determined by Floor Space Index (FSI) calculation but by the extent mentioned in the sale deed and allotment letter.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority
Haryana RERA Directs Ambience Projects To Hand Over Possession To Homebuyers, Pay Interest For Delay
Case - Rohit Madhok & another Versus M/s Ambience Projects and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Sanjeev Kumar Arora (Member), has directed Ambience Projects, the builder, to hand over possession of the flat to the homebuyer and pay interest for the delay in handing over the possession.
Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority
Punjab RERA – Homebuyer Who Accepts Possession Can't Claim Refund From Builder
Case – Sandeep Punj Versus M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited & others
While dismissing the homebuyer's complaint, the Punjab Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, consisting of Balbir Singh (Adjudicating Officer), held that a homebuyer who has accepted possession of the flat cannot seek a refund on the grounds of delay by the builder in handing over possession.