CESTAT Weekly Round-Up: 28 July To 3 August 2024

Update: 2024-08-05 05:55 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

Discounts Declared For Small Mid Segment Cars Can't Be Allowed To Luxury Model Cars: CESTATCase Title: M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited Versus The Commissioner of Central TaxThe Bangalore Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the cross-model utilisation of discounts is not admissible.No Service Tax Payable On Construction Services...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

Discounts Declared For Small Mid Segment Cars Can't Be Allowed To Luxury Model Cars: CESTAT

Case Title: M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited Versus The Commissioner of Central Tax

The Bangalore Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the cross-model utilisation of discounts is not admissible.

No Service Tax Payable On Construction Services Provided To Educational Institutions Prior To 30.06.2012: CESTAT

Case Title: Sri Mookambigai Constructions India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST & C. Ex, Coimbatore

The Chennai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that service tax is not payable on the construction services provided to educational institutions for the disputed period, which is prior to 30.06.2012.

Manufacturing Of Aircrafts Parts Covered Under “Engineering Goods”, No Excise Duty Payable: CESTAT

Case Title: M/s.Taneja Aerospace and Aviation Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that excise duty exemption is available on the manufacturing of aircraft parts.

EPS-ECU Meant Solely For Use In Automobiles With Power Steering: CESTAT Delhi Classifies Same Under CTI 8708 94 00

Case Title: M/s Mitsubishi Electric Automotive vs. Commissioner of Customs

While finding that the EPS-ECU is meant solely for use in automobiles with power steering, the CESTAT New Delhi held that EPS-ECU, which is essentially a part of an automobile specifically designed to be a part of power steering and which has no other function, cannot be classified in the general residual entry of electrical machines and equipment.

No Service Tax Payable On Banking Services Rendered By PNB To RBI: CESTAT

Case Title: M/s Punjab National Bank Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chandigarh

The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)has held that no service tax is payable on banking services rendered by Punjab National Bank (PNB) to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

Cenvat Credit Refund Can't Be Denied For Quoting Wrong Rule: CESTAT

Case Title: M/s Welspring Universal Versus Commissioner of Central Tax Appeals – II, Delhi

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that refund of Cenvat credit cannot be taken away because the appellant had quoted the wrong rule in filing its refund claim.

Full View


Tags:    

Similar News