Nominal Index [Citations 327 - 339]: Saibanna s/o Ningappa Natikar AND The Union of India & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 327The Union of India v. Malini & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 328Muzammil & ANR v. State of Karnataka & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 329Dr Lakhsmi P Gowda AND National Board of Examinations In Medical Sciences & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 330Hampamma &...
Nominal Index [Citations 327 - 339]:
Saibanna s/o Ningappa Natikar AND The Union of India & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 327
The Union of India v. Malini & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 328
Muzammil & ANR v. State of Karnataka & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 329
Dr Lakhsmi P Gowda AND National Board of Examinations In Medical Sciences & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 330
Hampamma & Others And State Through Lingasugur P.S. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 331
A S MALLIKARJUNASWAMY, AND STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 332
Naveen Kumar H N & Others AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 333
M/s Deco Equipments Pvt Ltd AND The State of Karnataka & others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 334
P Ramaprasad And Thyagaraj R & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 335
Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd & Others AND Chief Quality Assurance Establishment & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 336
Project Vruksha Foundation V State Board For Wildlife (SBWL). 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 337
Dr Kallappa Mahadevappa Hosmani AND The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayukt. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 338
A MANJU And PRAJWAL REVANNA @ PRAJWAL R. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 339
Judgments/Orders
Case Title: Saibanna s/o Ningappa Natikar AND The Union of India & Others
Case No: Writ Petition no. 3297 of 2013
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 327
The Karnataka High Court has set aside the death penalty imposed on a 70-year-old murder convict and commuted it to life imprisonment, after he spent 30 years behind bars and of which almost two decades he spent in solitary confinement.
A division bench of Justice G Narendar and Justice C M Poonacha allowed the writ petition filed by Saibanna Ningappa Natikar on two grounds—in-ordinate delay of 7 years and eight months in deciding his mercy petition and that he was made to suffer a singular cell confinement/solitary confinement without the sanction of law.
Case Title: The Union of India v. Malini & Others
Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 12947 OF 2017
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 328
The Karnataka High Court has held that the Railway Claims Tribunal has no power to punish any person for disobeying its orders, granting compensation to claimants.
A single judge bench of Justice R Nataraj allowed the petition filed by the Union of India and quashed a 2017 order passed by the Tribunal, issuing show cause notice to the General Manager, South Western Railway, as to why action should not be initiated against him for non-compliance of the order of the Tribunal.
Case Title: Muzammil & ANR v. State of Karnataka & ANR
Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101193 OF 2023
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 329
The Karnataka High Court has quashed a criminal case registered against two youth accused of writing “Hijab is our dignity” with black paint on the walls of a Government Girls High School, near CMC Hosapete, Vijayanagara.
A single judge bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna sitting at Dharwad allowed the petition filed by Muzammil (23) and Mohammad Jamaul (25), and quashed the proceedings initiated against them under Section 3 of the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981.
Case Title: Dr Lakhsmi P Gowda AND National Board of Examinations In Medical Sciences & Others
Case No: Writ Petition No 12859/2023
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 330
The Karnataka High Court has come to the aid of a 23 years old student, who while filling-up the online registration application for National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test-PG (NEET-PG), inadvertently failed to choose her caste under the quota reserved for OBC category.
A division bench of Justice G Narendar and Justice Vijaykumar A Patil allowed the petition filed by Dr. Lakshmi P Gowda and directed the National Board of Examinations In Medical Sciences to permit her to correct the entry in Column No.7 of the application/score card and amend it to read from General to OBC.
Case Title: Hampamma & Others And State Through Lingasugur P.S
Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200652/2022
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 331
The Karnataka High Court has dismissed a petition filed by seven persons accused of misappropriating funds sanctioned in respect of 'Swachh Bharat Mission Project' for construction of toilets within the limits of Honnalli, Gudadanal and Yaradona Villages between July 2016 and May 2017.
A single bench of Justice Venkatesh Naik T, sitting at Kalaburagi dismissed the petition filed by Hampamma and others who are charged for offences punishable under sections 420, 409, 201, of the Indian Penal Code. It said, “On perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioners without constructing toilets misappropriated the funds to the tune of Rs.68.19 lakhs sanctioned by the Government under 'Swachh Bharat Mission'. Admittedly, disputed question of fact cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., at this stage, only prima facie case is to be seen.”
Case Title: A S MALLIKARJUNASWAMY, AND STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & others.
Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 23695 OF 2022
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 332
The Karnataka High Court has set aside an order passed by the State Information Commissioner rejecting an application filed by a college professor seeking service record details of his colleague.
A single bench of Justice Krishna S Dixit allowed the petition filed by A S Mallikarjunaswamy and set aside the of Commission whereby his RTI application had been negatived quoting the provisions of Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
Case Title: Naveen Kumar H N & Others AND State of Karnataka & Others
Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 4979 OF 2023 (S-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 6588 OF 2023
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 333
The Karnataka High Court has upheld the government circular dated 01.02.2023 which provides clarification on the application of reservations under Article 371J of the Constitution for candidates from the Kalyana Karnataka Region, formerly known as the Hyderabad-Karnataka region.
Justice N S Sanjay Gowda highlighted that the core objective of introducing special provisions in the Hyderabad-Karnataka region was to acknowledge its underdevelopment and offer incentives for education and employment. "...the very objective of amending the Constitution and making special provisions in respect of the Hyderabad-Karnataka region was to, firstly, acknowledge the fact that the Hyderabad-Karnataka region was not as well developed as the other parts of Karnataka and secondly, to make provisions to ensure that it was treated differently and grant incentives to the persons hailing from the region in the matter of providing education and employment (including by promotion to persons hailing from the region) so as to ensure that the Hyderabad-Karnataka region comes out of its backwardness. Thus, any orders made in exercise of the powers under Article 371J would have to be examined and considered keeping in mind this underlying objective."
Case Title: M/s Deco Equipments Pvt Ltd AND The State of Karnataka & others.
Case No: WRIT PETITION No.33180 OF 2016
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 334
The Karnataka High Court has made it clear that the market value of land acquired under section 4(1) the Land Acquisition Act 1894, is to be determined as per Section 26 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013, if the award is passed after the 2013 Act came into force.
A single bench of S Sunil Dutt Yadav allowed the petition filed by M/s Deco Equipments Pvt Ltd and quashed the Award dated 20.01.2016 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Mysore District.
Case Title: P Ramaprasad And Thyagaraj R & Others
Case No: CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.70/2022
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 335
The Karnataka High Court has held that filing a suit for property partition after a lapse of 90 years of passing a final decree is not maintainable if the possession has not been delivered as per the preliminary and final decrees.
Justice H P Sandesh added that the same ought to have been enforced by filing an execution petition within the period of limitation.
"Having referred Section 47 of CPC, it is clear that when there was a decree between the parties and relating to the execution, discharge of satisfaction of the decree, shall be determined by the Court executing the decree and not by a separate suit. In the case on hand, already there was a decree in respect of the Munireddy’s share and pleading of the plaintiff also clear that share has been determined and final decree also was drawn on 14.5.1928 and instead of executing the final decree by filing execution petition, a separate suit is filed before the Court and hence, it is clear that it is nothing but clever drafting of the plaint while filing the suit for the relief of seeking once again for partition."
Case Title: Jambo Plastics Pvt. Ltd & Others AND Chief Quality Assurance Establishment & Others.
Case No: Writ Petition No.40510 OF 2017
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 336
The Karnataka High Court has held that authorities cannot rely on executive guidelines for issue of NOC for regulating building constructions around Defence establishments, as long as the Works of Defence Act, 1903 is in operation.
A single bench of Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav allowed the petition filed by Jambo Plastics Pvt Ltd and directed BBMP to consider sanctioning the former's plan, which is kept in abeyance, without insisting for adherence to the Guidelines dated 21-10-2016. It said, “Executive Guidelines have no place when the field is occupied by Legislation, the Guidelines cannot be relied upon by the Union Government to impose restriction as long as the Works of Defence Act, 1903 is in operation and is not amended."
Case Title: Project Vruksha Foundation v State Board For Wildlife (SBWL) Case No: WRIT PETITION NO. 8067 OF 2020 (GM-RES-PIL) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 8181 OF 2020 (GM-RES-PIL) & WRIT PETITION NO. 12132 OF 2020 (GM-RES-PIL
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 337
The South-Western Railway has submitted an affidavit before the Karnataka High Court stating that it will submit a revised proposal seeking permission for laying of Hubli-Ankola Railway Line Project after mitigating the gaps and deficiencies in the earlier proposal as is pointed out by the National Board for Wildlife.
The affidavit filed by the Deputy Chief Engineer states, “South Western Railways (SWR), Hubli, shall follow the directions issued by NBWL and shall prepare a mitigation plan for the Hubli-Ankola Railway Line project, in consultation with Wildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun and follow any other directives of NBWL and MOEF & CC, and shall commence the work only after getting all the clearances/approvals as required under law."
Case Title: Dr Kallappa Mahadevappa Hosmani AND The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Karnataka Lokayukt.
Case No: Criminal Petition No. 103443 OF 2022
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 338
The Karnataka High Court has asked the Karnataka Lokayukta to "set its house in order" by directing completion of investigation registered against public servants under the Prevention of Corruption Act, within a time frame.
A single bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna sitting at Dharwad said, “This Court has come across several cases where investigation has gone on for ages and no final report was filed. It, therefore, speaks volumes of lackadaisical attitude on the part of the prosecution/ Lokayukta.”
Case Title: A MANJU And PRAJWAL REVANNA @ PRAJWAL R.
Case No: EP 1/2019 C/W EP 2/2019.
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 339
The Karnataka High Court on Friday declared the election of MP Prajwal Revanna of the Janatha Dal Secular Party as null and void for filing false information in his election affidavit.
Justice K Natarajan while pronouncing the order said, “Both the Election petitions are allowed in part. The election of returned candidate respondent no. 1 alias Prajwal R, Member of the Parliament, having being declared as returned candidate dated 23-05-2019, is hereby declared as null and void.”