Can State Education Boards Permit Religious Education In Schools? : Allahabad HC Seeks Response Of Union Education & Minority Ministries

Update: 2024-01-31 14:20 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

The Allahabad High Court today asked the Union Ministry of Education and Union Ministry of Minority Affairs as to whether the State can have statutory Education Boards, permitting religious education.A bench of Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Subhash Vidyarthi put up this query to the Centre while dealing with a writ petition raising certain issues about Madarsa Board and the management...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Allahabad High Court today asked the Union Ministry of Education and Union Ministry of Minority Affairs as to whether the State can have statutory Education Boards, permitting religious education.

A bench of Justice Vivek Chaudhary and Justice Subhash Vidyarthi put up this query to the Centre while dealing with a writ petition raising certain issues about Madarsa Board and the management of Madarsa by the Minority Welfare Department, both by Union of India and State Government and other connected issues.

The petition, filed by one Anshuman Singh Rathore, has also challenged the vires of the UP Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004 and provisions of the Right of Children to Free And Compulsory Education (Amendment) Act, 2012.

The Court has been hearing the matter day-to-day since January 29 wherein it has also raised various queries with the Union of India, the Uttar Pradesh government and the UP Madarsa Education Board (details provided at the bottom of this article).

Last month, the HC had even questioned the UOI, State govt regarding the need for the Madarsa Board to run under the Minority Department rather than the Education Department of the state.

The Court has also raised concerns about potential arbitrariness and the need for transparency in the administration of educational institutions, emphasizing the broader issue of whether such decisions align with principles of equal opportunity and secular governance.

The outcome of these inquiries could have implications for the structure and functioning of the Madarsa Boards in the state given the fact that the state government is currently surveying the Islamic education institutions in 2022 and has also formed an SIT to probe madrassas' funds from abroad.

During the hearing in the matter, the Court noted that the HC has, in October 2019, already referred a similar set of essential questions surrounding the concerns of the functioning and structure of the Madrasa board to a Larger Bench (Writ Petition No.29324 (S/S) of 2019: Mohammad Javed Vs. State of U.P. and others).

The questions referred to a larger bench are:

"(i) Since the Madarsa Board is constituted for education in 'Arbic, Urdu, Parsian, Islamic-studies, Tibb Logic, Philosophy and includes such other branches of learning as may be specified by the Board from time to time', how come persons of a particular religion are provided to be member of the same? It does not talks about exponence in the aforesaid fields, for the purposes of which the Board is constituted, but persons of specific religion. It was put to learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel as to whether the purpose of the Board is to impart religious education only, to which he submits that a perusal of the Madarsa Education Act, 2004 does not indicate so.
(ii) With a secular constitution in India can persons of a particular religion be appointed/nominated in a Board for education purposes or it should be persons belonging to any religion, who are exponent in the fields for the purposes of which the Board is constituted or such persons should be appointed, without any regard to religion, who are exponent in the field for the purposes of which the Board is constituted?
(iii) The Act further provides the Board to function under the Minority Welfare Ministry of State of U.P., hence, a question arises as to whether it is arbitrary for providing the Madarsa education to be run under the Minority Welfare Department while all the other education institutions including those belonging to other minorities communities like Jains, Sikhs, Christians etc being run under the Education Ministry and whether it arbitrarily denies the benefit of experts of education and their policies to the children studying in Madarsa?

Against this backdrop, stressing that the issues impact a huge number of students in the country and the quality of their education, more so when read with Article 21-A of the Constitution of India, the Court last month directed the counsels for Madarsa Board, Union of India and the State Government to bring all available material/views of the respective parties before the Court along with any policies in vogue on their part with three weeks.

The matter has now been posted for further hearing on February 1, 2024.

Case title - Anshuman Singh Rathore vs. Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Edu. New Delhi And 3 Others

Click Here To Read/Download Order


Tags:    

Similar News