National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC Holds Experion Developers Liable For Deficiency In Service Case Title: Mitesh Bhalla & Anr. Vs. Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd. Case Number: C.C. No. 326/2019 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Justice Sudip Ahluwalia held Experion Developers liable for deficiency in service and stated...
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
NCDRC Holds Experion Developers Liable For Deficiency In Service
Case Title: Mitesh Bhalla & Anr. Vs. Experion Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Case Number: C.C. No. 326/2019
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Justice Sudip Ahluwalia held Experion Developers liable for deficiency in service and stated that forfeiture of more than 10% of the basic sale price by the developer is unreasonable.
Delay In Settling Insurance Claim: NCDRC Holds Oriental Insurance Liable For Deficiency In Service
Case Title: Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. M/S. Hind Metals & Industries (P) Ltd
Case Number: F.A. No. 1196/2018
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Mr. Subhash Chandra and Dr. Sadhna Shanker held Oriental Insurance liable for deficiency in service over wrongful repudiation and delay in settling the insurance claim amount.
Case Title: Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Ltd. Vs. Uttam Rao Pawade & Anr.
Case No: Revision Petition No. 3169 OF 2016
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission presided by Justice A. P. Sahi (President) and DR. Inder Jit Singh (Member) held that a Consumer Complaint cannot be dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of party without whom an effective order can be passed.
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI)
FSSAI Issues Advisory For E-Commerce Food Business Operators To Ensure Consumer Protection
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has issued directives on food safety norms to E-commerce Food Business Operators (FBOs) such as Swiggy, Zomato, Big Basket, etc. This was done with an intent to ensure that consumers receive safe and accurately represented products. Due compliance of the directions would make the industry more transparent thereby eliminating the possibilities of any risks and fraudulent practices.
Delhi Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Delhi State Commission Holds FIITJEE Liable For Holding Entire Course Fee Collected In Advance
Case Title: FIITJEE vs Rajeev Luthra
Case Number: First Appeal 249/2014
The Delhi State Commission bench presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, Judicial Member Pinki and General Member J.P Agrawal has held that coaching institutes collecting fees for the entire course in advance can use the said fees only for the particular semester and the balance amount to be kept deposited in a bank account.
Case Title: ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Inderjeeet Singh
Case Number: F.A. No. 15/2016
The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Ms. Pinki held ICICI Lombard General Insurance liable for deficiency in service and held that a claim cannot be rejected merely because of failure to strictly adhere to procedural formalities.
Case Title: National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Shiva Fashion
Case Number: F.A. NO. 642/2023
The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Ms. Pinki held National Insurance liable for deficiency in service over wrongful repudiation of legitimate insurance claims. It further held that insurers cannot introduce new repudiation grounds during the policy claim.
Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: Astha Gupta vs Country Holidays Inn & Suites
Case Number: Complaint Case 127/2022 [ Delhi district commission, West]
The Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (West) has held Country Holidays Inn & Suites liable for withholding the holiday membership amount of the complainant even when no holiday stays were booked by him under the package. The bench presided by President Sonica Mehrotra, Member Richa Jindal and Member Anil Kumar Koushal has observed that forfeiting such hard earned money of the complainant amounts to undue enrichment to the hotel and is an unfair trade practice.
Baramulla District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Case Title: Amit Pandita vs Aman Kumar (Manager), Religare Broking ltd.
Case Number: Consumer Complaint 32/2024
The Baramulla District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Jammu & Kashmir) has held Religare Broking Ltd. liable for non-closure of an inoperative demat and trading account despite payment of requisite fee by the complainant. The bench presided by President Peerzada Quosar Hussain and Member Nyla Yaseen observed that the company was under an obligation to close the said account of the complainant after receiving all charges and fee.
Baramulla District Commission Holds Supplier Liable For Supplying Substandard Materials
Case Title: M/S Royal Builders vs. Rahis Mirza & Anr.
Case No: Complaint Case No. 45/2023
The Baramulla District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission bench of Peerzada Qousar Hussian (President) and Ms Nyla Yaseen (Member) holds supplier liable for deficiency in service for supplying materials that were not of acceptable quality.