Punjab AG : here an example of fruit chaat and jam... ... Is Sub-Classification Permissible Within SC/ST Categories? Live Updates From Supreme Court 7-Judge Bench Hearing [Day 1]

Punjab AG : here an example of fruit chaat and jam comes. if the intention of the legislature was to make it into a jam once they come in a jar, then inclusion -exclusion becomes of no use. After the jam, you cannot take the apple out and leave the peach inside. But if the option is given to the parliament to remain one and take out the other , it is a fruit chaat and not a jam. But the court proceeded on the conclusion that once they come in one, birthmarks are lost which in my submission is an erroneous submission of 341

"Thus from the scheme of the Constitution, Article 341 and above opinions of this Court in the case of N.M. Thomas (supra), it is clear that the castes once included in the Presidential List, form a class by themselves. If they are one class under the Constitution, any division of these classes of persons based on any consideration would amount to tinkering with the Presidential List."

The Court Breaks for Lunch