"This is a mandatory provision as it used the word... ... Tata Sons v Cyrus Mistry - Live Updates From Supreme Court [Day-6]

"This is a mandatory provision as it used the word 'shall'. The mandatory notice for the meeting held in 2016 wasn't served. This is not in compliance of the provision. "

He refers to note 1 again and reads out 

Update: 2020-12-16 09:10 GMT

Linked news