Parikh - In Sampat’s case the argument was that... ... [Article 370] [Day-5] Hearing On Kashmir Petitions [Live-Updates From Supreme Court]

Parikh - In Sampat’s case the argument was that after the 1954 Order, whatever Orders came could not have been passed without the Constituent Assembly.

Parikh : After the CA has come to an end, Art. 370 ceases to operate.

Reddy J. - This is also the argument made by you ?

Parikh - Yes. If you look at 370 in Kaul’s case, the reasons given : interpretation of 370.

Reddy J. - That we appreciate. But, where is the conflict ? Kaul judgement could have never appreciated the question of CA because it was no longer in existence.