Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant, Munmun Dhamecha - Bail Applications Dismissed As Non-Maintainable - LIVE UPDATES

Update: 2021-10-08 06:55 GMT
trueasdfstory

A Mumbai Court will consider the bail applications filed by Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant, Munmun Dhamecha and others in the Cruise Ship Drug case.The court on Thursday rejected further NCB Custody of Aryan Khan, son of Bollywood actor Shahrukh Khan, actor Arbaaz Merchant and model Munmun Dhamecha and other accused in the case.Aryan Khan and 7 other accused have been remanded to judicial...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

A Mumbai Court will consider the bail applications filed by Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant, Munmun Dhamecha and others in the Cruise Ship Drug case.

The court on Thursday rejected further NCB Custody of Aryan Khan, son of Bollywood actor Shahrukh Khan, actor Arbaaz Merchant and model Munmun Dhamecha and other accused in the case.

Aryan Khan and 7 other accused have been remanded to judicial custody instead.

"No custodial interrogation is required as sufficient time was granted to the investigating officer for investigation," Additional Metropolitan Magistrate RM Nirlekar said.

Live Updates
2021-10-08 11:38 GMT

Mumbai Court rejects bail applications of Aryan Khan, Arbaaz Merchant and Munmun Dhamecha holding that the applications are not maintainable. 

2021-10-08 11:35 GMT

Court - Heard, considered, decisions cited, applications are not maintainable hence rejected.

2021-10-08 11:34 GMT

Judge says that he will dictate the entire order today.

2021-10-08 11:33 GMT

Court - I am anxious to pass the order in open court but ill give the operative part here. 

2021-10-08 11:31 GMT

Maneshinde cites the case of Kaizan who was arrested along with Rhea and granted bail on the same day as the prosecution did not object.

Maneshinde - I am also sorry about what happened in court (With ASG), there was nothing personal. We have been friends for 38/39 years.

2021-10-08 11:29 GMT

Maneshinde - Just because I come from an affluent family doesn't mean I'll tamper with evidence.

What influence have I used? I am suffering from the last six days.

2021-10-08 11:27 GMT

Maneshinde says this is a case of no material against Khan.

They held me for 7 days. Even if they want to say I will tamper with evidence, they should come with a positive case of how I will do it.

Just bald allegations!

2021-10-08 11:25 GMT

Maneshinde - All of this will arise only if I am saying the sections are bailable.

You charge me with anything, but without material I am entitled to bail.

2021-10-08 11:23 GMT

Maneshinde says that Stefan Mueller's judgement lays down the law.

And Rhea Chalraborty's subsequent judgement goes beyond the rule of interpretation and precedence.

Says that a coordinate bench can not take a different view.

2021-10-08 11:20 GMT

Maneshinde says Section 36A can be seen again...

"36A of NDPS Act speaks about trial, not about grant of bail. For grant of bail, Section 437 CrPC is to be seen.

Just because Section 27A is applied to the entire case, that charge cannot be foisted on me."

Tags:    

Similar News