Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 141 NI Act"

[S.138 NI Act] Not Making Company Separate Accused In Cheque Bouncing Complaint Isn't Fatal To Prosecution Case: Jharkhand HC
S.141 NI Act | Signatory Cannot Be Made Vicariously Liable In A Sole Proprietary Trading: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Cheque Dishonour | No Vicarious Liability On Directors If Company Acquitted Of Offence Under NI Act: Kerala High Court
Holding Chairpersons Of Large Companies Liable For Dishonour Of Cheques Would Unfairly Expand ‘Vicarious Liability’ Under NI Act: Delhi High Court
'Moratorium U/S 14(1) IBC Applies Only To Corporate Debtor; Non-Corporate Debtors U/S 141 NI Act Continue To Be Statutorily Liable': Kerala HC
[S.138 NI Act] Person In Charge Of Trust Can't Be Arraigned As Accused Without Impleading The Trust Itself: Orissa High Court
S.138 NI Act | Proprietor & Proprietary Concern Need Not Be Arrayed Separately As Accused: Karnataka High Court
Cheque Case Against Director/Partner Of Firm Can Be Quashed Only If There Is Unimpeachable & Incontrovertible Evidence That They Were Not Concerned With Issuance Of Cheque: Supreme Court
S.141 NI Act | Sole Proprietor Alone Can't Be Sued For Offence U/S 138, Sole Proprietary Concern Must Also Be Arrayed As Accused: P&H High Court
Section 141 NI Act - Not Necessary To Specifically Plead That Managing Director Is In Charge Of The Company's Affairs : Supreme Court
S.138 NI Act | Non-Executive Directors Not Liable For Company's Actions/ Omissions Unless Involved In Day-To-Day Affairs: Bombay High Court
[Section 138 NI Act] Chairman/Director Of The Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Without Impleading The Company As Accused: MP HC [Read Order]