PMLA Review | Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing At Request Of Parties, Lists Matter On Nov 27

The Supreme Court today adjourned the review petitions filed against the Vijay Madanlal Choudhary judgement, which upheld various provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Next date given in the matter is November 27.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant, CT Ravikumar and Ujjal Bhuyan passed the order, at a request made by the parties. While the petitioners submitted that Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal was on his legs in a part-heard, ED counsel Zoheb Hossain responded that ED was not opposing the request.

Notably, the matter was first listed on August 7 and has been getting adjourned since.  

Background

The VMC judgment was delivered on July 27, 2022 by a bench comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari and CT Ravikumar. Vide this judgment, certain provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) were upheld. These included -

(i) Sections 5, 8(4), 15, 17 and 19 of PMLA, relating to Enforcement Directorate's power of arrest, attachment, search and seizure;

(ii) Section 24 of PMLA, relating to reverse burden of proof (in this regard, the Court said the provision had "reasonable nexus" with the objects of the Act);

(iii) Section 45 of PMLA, which provides "twin-conditions" for bail (in this regard, it was said that the Parliament was competent to amend the provision in 2018 even after the Supreme Court's judgment in Nikesh Tarachand Shah, which struck down the conditions).

Subsequent to this decision, the instant review petitions (8 in number) were filed. With the retirement of Justice Khanwilkar, then CJI NV Ramana presided over the bench to consider the petitions.

While issuing notice on August 25, 2022, CJI Ramana-led bench orally observed that at least two conclusions of the judgment required relook - first, that the copy of the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR; equivalent of FIR in money laundering cases) need not be given to the accused, and second, the upholding of the reversal of presumption of innocence.

Thereafter, the Court allowed an application for open court hearing of the review petitions. Since issuance of notice, the petitions were listed for hearing for the first time on August 7. On this date, the matter had to be adjourned at request of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who sought some time to prepare and argue. Subsequently, pursuant to a mentioning, the matter was listed on September 18 but got re-listed for October 16. On the said date, it could not be taken up as Justice Kant was on leave.

Case Title : Karti P Chidambaram v. The Directorate of Enforcement | RP(Crl) 219/2022 (and connected cases)