'Harvest Season, Son's Marriage, Health Issues, Aged Parents' : Reasons Cited By Bilkis Bano Case Convicts For Extension Of Time To Surrender

Update: 2024-01-19 02:53 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

The Supreme Court will hear today multiple applications filed by the convicts in the Bilkis Bano case seeking an extension of time to surrender before jail authorities. Last week, in a significant development, the Supreme Court set aside the remission orders passed by the Gujarat government allowing the premature release of the 11 convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for multiple murders...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Supreme Court will hear today multiple applications filed by the convicts in the Bilkis Bano case seeking an extension of time to surrender before jail authorities. Last week, in a significant development, the Supreme Court set aside the remission orders passed by the Gujarat government allowing the premature release of the 11 convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for multiple murders and gang rapes against the backdrop of the 2002 Gujarat communal riots. 

The life-termers were released early by the State of Gujarat in August 2022 after only serving 14 years of sentence, in terms of a 1992 remission policy. However, a bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, has now ruled that the State of Gujarat lacked jurisdiction to grant remission in the case as the trial was held in the State of Maharashtra and granted the convicts two weeks time till this Sunday to surrender.

In view of the impending deadline, Senior Advocate V Chitambaresh, appearing for three convicts, mentioned their applications before a bench led by Justice Nagarathna yesterday morning seeking an urgent hearing of the extension pleas. The judge was also informed that more applications would be filed in the course of the day. In response, Justice Nagarathna directed the registry to obtain instructions from Chief Justice DY Chandrachud on the issue of reconstitution of the bench that handed out this verdict and the listing of the applications today. 

A bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan will hear the applications today.

Below are the names of the convicts who have sought an extension of the time granted for surrendering before jail authorities and the reasons cited in support of such request -

Sl No.

Name of Convict

Time Sought

Reason(s) Cited

1

Radheshyam Bhagwandas Shah (R3)

Six weeks

Looks after aged parents with health issues, wife and 21-year-old son, has to make financial arrangements before surrendering

2

Jaswantbhai Chaturbhai Nai (R4)

Six weeks

Upcoming harvest season, entire family dependent on agricultural income

3

Govindbhai Nai (R5)

Four weeks

Sole caretaker of aged parents with health issues as well as two children, own medical conditions like asthma and haemorrhoids

4

Shaileshbhai Chimanlal Bhatt (R6)

Six weeks

Son's marriage, upcoming harvest season, age and medical conditions

5

Bipinchand Kaniyalal Joshi (R7)

Six weeks

Leg surgery leading to partial handicap, looks after brother and wife, the latter battling cancer

6

Kesharbhai Khimabhai Vohania (R8)

Six weeks

Son's marriage, medical conditions

7

Pradip Ramanlal Modhiya (R9)

Four weeks

Wife's death, lung surgery

8

Rajubhai Babulal Soni (R11)

Six weeks

Looks after aged mother with health issues, wife and two sons, has to make financial arrangements before surrendering

9

Mitesh Chimanlal Bhatt (R12)

Six weeks

Upcoming harvest season, son's surgery

10

Ramesh Rupabhai Chandana (R13)

Six weeks

Heart ailment, upcoming harvest season, fixing son's marriage, looks after aged and ailing mother

The Supreme Court on January 8 set aside the remission of 11 convicts sentenced to life imprisonment for multiple murders and gang rapes, including that of Bilkis Bano, during the 2002 communal riots in Gujarat. After an 11-day-long hearing that began in August, a division bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan had reserved its judgment in this case on October 12. Advocate Shobha Gupta appeared for Bilkis, while Senior Advocates Indira Jaising, and advocates Vrinda Grover, Aparna Bhat, Nizamuddin Pasha, and Pratik R Bombarde represented various public interest litigants. Additional Solicitor-General SV Raju appeared for both the State of Gujarat and the Union of India. The now-released convicts were represented by Senior advocates Sidharth Luthra, Rishi Malhotra, S Guru Krishnakumar, Advocate Sonia Mathur, and others.

The reports about the judgment can be read here.

Case Title

Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Ors. | Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 491 of 2022

Tags:    

Similar News