Mere Harassment Will Not Amount To Abetment Of Suicide U/s 306 IPC, Reiterates Supreme Court

Mere harassment would not amount to an offence of abetment of suicide under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, the Supreme Court reiterated.

The bench of Justices L. Nagaswera Rao and Aniruddha Bose observed that, in order to bring a case within Section 306 IPC, there must be a case of suicide and in the commission of the said offence, the person who is said to have abetted the commission of suicide must have played an active role by an act of instigating or by doing a certain act to facilitate the commission of suicide.

In this case, the deceased allegedly committed suicide in his house by consuming poison and also left four suicide notes. In these notes, it was mentioned that suicide is because the accused did not send his wife and daughter with him and that they are liable for his suicide.The High Court had allowed the revision petition filed by the accused and set aside the Trial Court order framing charge them. In appeal before the Apex court, it was contended that the abetment of the offence of suicide by the accused is prima facie made out as the harassment by them facilitated the act of suicide by the deceased.

"In order to bring a case within the provision of Section 306 IPC, there must be a case of suicide and in the commission of the said offence, the person who is said to have abetted the commission of suicide must have played an active role by an act of instigating or by doing a certain act to facilitate the commission of suicide. Mere harassment without any positive action on the part of the accused proximate to the time of occurrence which led to the suicide would not amount to an offence under Section 306 IPC.", the bench said referring to the judgment in Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal(2010) 1 SCC 707.

The court added that abetment by a person is when a person instigates another to do something and that the instigation can be inferred where the accused had, by his acts or omission created such circumstances that the deceased was left with no option except to commit suicide. [Referred to Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)(2009) 16 SCC 605]

The bench therefore dismissed the appeal observing that the allegation is that they harassed the deceased, but there is no other material on record which indicates abetment.

Case: Shabbir Hussain vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [SLP(Crl) 7284/2017]
Coram: Justices L. Nagaswera Rao and Aniruddha Bose
Citation: LL 2021 SC 341

Click here to Read/Download Order