Karnataka HC Strikes Down 25% Domicile Reservation in National Law School of India University(NLSIU), Bangalore

Update: 2020-09-29 12:39 GMT
story

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday struck down the 25 percent domicile reservation at the National Law School of India University for students of Karnataka introduced by the state government on April 27.A bench of Justice B V Nagarathna and Justice Ravi V Hosmani pronounced the order and said the "The amendment is ultra vires to the act. The State government has no State and has no direct...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday struck down the 25 percent domicile reservation at the National Law School of India University for students of Karnataka introduced by the state government on April 27.

A bench of Justice B V Nagarathna and Justice Ravi V Hosmani pronounced the order and said the "The amendment is ultra vires to the act. The State government has no State and has no direct say in the functioning of the law school. It is an autonomous institute and not aided by the state government."

The bench said the executive council of the University has powers to introduce reservation and "If we allow this thing (state reservation) to be done virtually there will be two centers of control, one with executive council and other by state which will be an unhealthy trend." It has observed that "By the impugned amendment what is sought to be created is a state quota which is not permissible."

The bench also has stated "NLSIU is on par with AIIMS, IIT and IIM, where there is no reservation quota." It has in the order said "This law school is not on par with other law schools. Other schools are giving reservations thus it is not necessary that Karnataka must also do it." Moreover, comparing the reservation in NLSIU with other law schools, the bench has said "Other law schools came up with reservations as students were not getting in Karnataka school under the 80 seats quota."

The bench has rejected the argument of the state government that the object of reservation was to retain talent in Karnataka. It said "Karnataka Students aspiration cannot be said to be in Karnataka alone when opportunities are available overseas and India."

The bench has suggested that "Executive Council of NLSIU consider Reservation for WOMEN and ECONOMICALLY WEAKER SECTIONS OF THE SOCIETY at the law school."

The court has concluded by saying "No scientific study is conducted, the reservation impact is contrary to what is the purpose of the law school. The impugned reservation is struck down as it does not meet the twin test of Article 14.

In March, the Karnataka State Assembly passed the National Law School Of India (Amendment) Act, 2020, which received the Karnataka Governor's assent on April 27. As per this amendment, NLSIU should reserve horizontally twenty-five percent of seats for 'students of Karnataka'.

The amendment inserts the following proviso in Section 4 of the National Law School of India Act :- "Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act and the regulations made thereunder, the school shall reserve horizontally twenty-five percent of seats for students of Karnataka."

As per the explanation of this section, "student of Karnataka" means a student who has studied in any one of the recognized educational institutions in the State for a period of not less than ten years preceding to the qualifying examination."

Tags:    

Similar News