Challenge Against Demonetisation : Supreme Court Constitution Bench To Pronounce Judgment On January 2, 2023
The Supreme Court will pronounce the judgment on the petitions challenging demonetisation on January 2, 2023.A Constitution Bench will rule on the validity of the decision taken by the Union Government six years ago to demonetise the currency notes of Rs. 500 and Rs.1000 denominations.The 5-judge comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna...
The Supreme Court will pronounce the judgment on the petitions challenging demonetisation on January 2, 2023.
A Constitution Bench will rule on the validity of the decision taken by the Union Government six years ago to demonetise the currency notes of Rs. 500 and Rs.1000 denominations.
The 5-judge comprising Justices S Abdul Nazeer, BR Gavai, AS Bopanna, V Ramasubramanian and BV Nagarathna had reserved the judgment on December 7, 2022. As per the causelist, the judgment seems to be unanimous, to be pronounced by Justice BR Gavai. The pronouncement date also happens to be the last working day of the presiding judge Justice Nazeer, who is retiring on January 3.
During the hearing, the bench had observed that it will not sit with folded hands just because it was an economic policy decision and stated that it can examine the manner in which the decision was taken.
The bench had initially expressed the view that the issue was "academic", considering the fact that six years have gone by since the decision and wondered if it can undo the actions. However, on October 12, the bench agreed to hear the matter on merits, after the persuasive arguments made by Senior Advocate P Chidambaram. The bench required the Union Government and the Reserve Bank of India to produce before it the relevant documents and files relating to the decision.
From the petitioners' side, Senior Advocate P Chidambaram opened the arguments. Although the effects of the decision cannot be undone, the Court should lay down the law for the future, so that "similar misadventures" are not repeated by the future governments. Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, Advocate Prashant Bhushan etc also made arguments for some petitioners. Among the batch were certain petitions filed by persons seeking extension of the deadline for exchanging the notes.
Attorney General for India R Venkataramani appeared for the Union Government to defend the decision. AG submitted that the decision was taken to curb the evils of fake currency, black money and terror funding. He argued that the scope of judicial review in economic policy decisions is extremely narrow. Even if it is assumed the demonetisation has not succeeded in producing the intended results, that cannot be a reason to invalidate the decision judicially, as it has been taken in good faith after following due process.
Senior Advocate Jaideep Gupta, appearing for the Reserve Bank of India, submitted that the Union Government took the decision based on the recommendation given by the central bank.
Reports of previous hearings :