Arvind Kejriwal's Challenge To ED Arrest : Live Updates From Supreme Court
J Khanna: You are right to the extent that there will be failure in the objective criteria if material in possession is ignored.
Singhvi: I am at Section 19. I have no access to unrelied documents
J Khanna: Opinion is that of the officer, not yours, not mine. test is subjective satisfaction of officer on objective criteria
MSR from YSR Congress*
Singhvi reading MSR's statement: I did not meet Kejriwal in context of Delhi Liquor Policy
J Khanna: is a list of unrelied documents given with reasons of arrest?
Singhvi: No, with complaint
Singhvi: MSR then MP from Congress, father of Raghav was forced to make statement in lieu of bail of son. Raghav is arrested on 11 February. After arrest, father in March'23 states that he met petitioner in Delhi for charitable land purposes
Singhvi: I gave 5 names, father Magunta, son Raghav, Sarath Reddy...my chart refers to them. See the circumstances in which the statements were given, the inducements
Hearing begins
Singhvi: I will show context and circumstances in which statements of witnesses were recorded. Then I will come to law on necessity of arrest, etc.
Hearing to begin shortly
Sr Adv AM Singhvi (for Kejriwal) and ASG SV Raju (for ED) present in court
Report of yesterday's hearing can be read here :