Another counsel: All leaders unequivocally said that J&K is integral part of India.
The counsel highlights that the consistent position of India before the UN security council has been that all sovereignty lies with Union and not J&K.
Counsel: Can someone be allowed to raise a question mark on nationality?...If in 2023 I have to prove that I am an Indian then is my dignity not affected?
Adv VK Biju: I'm appearing for a retired major...370(3) provides for a way to abrogate...368(2) has nothing to do with 370.
Dave: The full bench of HC held that they'll have the right even if they marry outside the State but the AG then said that they will not get right to employment, scholarship, right to hold immovable property...if you marry outside J&K.
Adv Archana Pathak Dave: Noone has talked about rights of women that were taken away. The permanent residentship would not come to women who married outside the State of J&K.
ASG Vikramjit Banerjee: The original Constitution in this chapter was temporary and transitional provision. This means that the objective of the original part was this was a transitional provision.
Agarwal: It automatically exercised derivative constituent powers. If it is exercising derivative constituent powers, it is akin to a legislative assembly.
Agarwal: The Maharaja who was not a sovereign could not have passed a better title than what he had. If he was not a sovereign, the constituent assembly could never have been a sovereign constituent assembly, could never have established a sovereign constitution.
Agarwal: The Maharaja already recognised supremacy of Indian constitution and three, unequivocally, Art 1 was enforced.