'Arnab Goswami Not An Editor Or Journalist' : Plea In SC For Perjury Against Republic TV Chief For Allegedly Misleading SC
An application has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking to initiate perjury proceedings against Arnab Goswami, Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV.The application filed by one Reepak Khansal states that Goswami made misleading statements in the writ petition filed by him in the SC seeking to quash the FIRs registered against him across the country.The applicant takes objection to the claims...
An application has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking to initiate perjury proceedings against Arnab Goswami, Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV.
The application filed by one Reepak Khansal states that Goswami made misleading statements in the writ petition filed by him in the SC seeking to quash the FIRs registered against him across the country.
The applicant takes objection to the claims made by Goswami in the plea that he is "a journalist and Editor".
It is stated that broadcasting employees and TV anchors do not come within the definition of "Editor" as per 'The Press and Registration Of Books Act 1867' and also under the ambit of 'working journalists' as defined under The Working Journalists And Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions Of service) And Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955.
There is no law enacted till today to bring broadcasting employees / Anchors in the definition of journalist and electronic broadcasting channels in the definition of 'PRESS, states the petition. Electronic media do not come under the ambit of Press Council of India as well, the applicant points out.
On these grounds, the applicant argues that Goswami knowingly made a false claim on affidavit before the SC, attracting the offence of perjury under Sections 191,199 and 200 of the Indian Penal Code.
Therefore, the petitioner urges the SC to initiate process under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to prosecute the Republic TV anchor for perjury.
Goswami had approached the SC on April 23 seeking to quash FIRs registered against him in various states over allegations that his reportage of the Palghar lynching incident amounted to creating communal disharmony.
On April 24, the SC granted him three weeks interim protection from arrest, and consolidated all FIRs and transferred them to Mumbai.
Goswami was later subjected to 12-hour long questioning by Mumbai police in the case.
Click here to download petition
Read Petition