Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 34 of the A&C Act"

Dismissal On Locus Standi Without Opportunity To Bring On Record Documents; Violation Of Section 18 Of The A&C Act: Gauhati High Court
If The Imposition Of LD Was Contingent On Extension Of Time, Recovery Of LD Is Not Time Barred: Delhi High Court
The Arbitrator Cannot Alter The Express Terms Of The Agreement Between The Parties By Applying The Business Efficacy Test: Delhi High Court
Sections 15 And 16 Of The MSMED Act Are Mandatory Provisions, Arbitrator Must Assign Reasons For Not Awarding Compound Interest: Delhi High Court
The Rejection Of An Application Under Section 34 Of The A&C Act Cannot Be Construed To Mean That The Court Has Concurred With The View Of The Arbitral Tribunal: Delhi High Court
Amendment To Section 34 Application Of The A&C Act Would Not Be Permissible If It Intends A New Challenge: Bombay High Court
Arbitral Award Vitiated By Serious Fraud And Criminal Conspiracy Can Be Set Aside In A Writ Petition: Chhattisgarh High Court
Claim Petition Without Verification, Writ Not Maintainable Against An Order Dismissal Of Claim : Gujarat High Court
Party Failing To Raise The Issue Of Jurisdiction At Section 11 Notice Stage Or During The Arbitral Proceedings, Ground Not Available Under Section 34: Gujarat High Court
Liquidated Damages Can't Be Imposed When The Engineer-In-Charge Holds That The Cause Of Delay Is Explained: Delhi High Court
If The Contract Is Extended By The Employer, It Cannot Be Allowed To Reduce The Period Of The Extension Retrospectively: Delhi High Court
Section 34 Proceedings Are Summary In Nature; Does Not Permit Additional Evidence To Be Filed Unless Absolutely Necessary: Madras High Court