Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 138 of NI Act"

Sworn Affidavit Compulsory Along With Private Complaint: Karnataka High Court Reiterates
Cheque Bounce Complaint U/S 138 NI Act Maintainable Even If Civil Suit For Recovery Is Instituted: Karnataka High Court Reiterates
Independent, Non-Executive Directors Of Company Cannot Be Held Liable Under Section 138 Of NI Act Without Specific Allegations: Delhi High Court
Magistrate's Clear Application of Mind Necessary For Issuance of Summons Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Delhi High Court
Dishonour Of Cheque Against Valid Loan Sufficient To Prosecute U/S 138 NI Act, Drawee Need Not Have Money Lending License: Rajasthan HC
Notice U/S 138 NI Act Valid If Sent To Last Known Address Of Accused, Onus On Accused To Say Why He Did Not Receive It: Karnataka HC
Litigants Keeping Disputes Alive For Malafide Reasons Has Tendency Of Keeping Courts' Docket Heavy: Delhi High Court
S.138 NI Act | Relevant Date For Determining 'Legally Enforceable Debt' Is Date Of Presentation/ Maturity Of Cheque: Rajasthan High Court
Does Demand Notice Sent Via 'Courier' Constitute A Valid Service In Cheque Dishonor Cases? Allahabad HC Answers
[Cheque Dishonour] When Defence Of Accused Is Not Believable, Court Can Infer That He Issued A Cheque For The Said Transaction: Karnataka HC
NI Act Doesn't Prescribe Who Will Represent Company Which Is Complainant U/S 138, Can Be Represented By An Employee: Allahabad High Court
Cheque Dishonour | Onus On Accused To Prove Cheque Issued Towards Repayment Of Loan Was Misused By Complainant: Karnataka High Court