Home
Lawyers & Law Firms
NRI Law
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Law Firms
Deal News
Law Firm Articles
Foreign Law Firms
Internships
Job Updates
Law Firm Events
SC Judgments
लाइव लॉ हिंदी
Law Schools
Call for Papers
Competitions
Interviews
Law School - Columns
Law School Articles
Moot Courts
News
School Admission
Seminars
Internships
Diploma/Certificate...
LLM/Phd
Law School Admission
Law School Cover Story
Law School Editors Pick
Placements
Scholarships/Fellowships
Top Corner Stories
IBC News
Tax
Arbitration
Events Corner
Sponsored
Top Stories
News Updates
Columns
Interviews
Foreign/International
RTI
Know the Law
Law Schools
Law Firms
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Events Corner
Videos
Sponsored
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Round Ups
IBC News
Environmental Law
Cartoons
Tax
Arbitration
Consumer Cases
X
Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 138 of NI Act"
Magistrate's Clear Application of Mind Necessary For Issuance of Summons Under Section 138 Of NI Act: Delhi High Court
Dishonour Of Cheque Against Valid Loan Sufficient To Prosecute U/S 138 NI Act, Drawee Need Not Have Money Lending License: Rajasthan HC
Notice U/S 138 NI Act Valid If Sent To Last Known Address Of Accused, Onus On Accused To Say Why He Did Not Receive It: Karnataka HC
Litigants Keeping Disputes Alive For Malafide Reasons Has Tendency Of Keeping Courts' Docket Heavy: Delhi High Court
S.138 NI Act | Relevant Date For Determining 'Legally Enforceable Debt' Is Date Of Presentation/ Maturity Of Cheque: Rajasthan High Court
Does Demand Notice Sent Via 'Courier' Constitute A Valid Service In Cheque Dishonor Cases? Allahabad HC Answers
[Cheque Dishonour] When Defence Of Accused Is Not Believable, Court Can Infer That He Issued A Cheque For The Said Transaction: Karnataka HC
NI Act Doesn't Prescribe Who Will Represent Company Which Is Complainant U/S 138, Can Be Represented By An Employee: Allahabad High Court
Cheque Dishonour | Onus On Accused To Prove Cheque Issued Towards Repayment Of Loan Was Misused By Complainant: Karnataka High Court
Cheque Dishonour | Wife Not Signatory, Cannot Be Held Liable For Cheque Signed & Given By Husband From Joint Account: Bombay High Court
Does Prosecution Under IPC After Filing Of 138 NI Act Complaint Amount To Double Jeopardy? Punjab & Haryana HC Explains
S.202 CrPC | Magistrate's Order Showing Application Of Mind Not Bad For “Absence Of Magic Words” About Prima Facie Satisfaction: Calcutta HC
Next Page >