Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Section 11(6) of the A&C Act"

Arbitration | Referral Courts Must Not Conduct Intricate Enquiry On Whether Claims Are Time-Barred : Supreme Court Clarifies 'Arif Azim' Judgment
A Party Cannot Unilaterally Appoint The Presiding Arbitrator Upon The Failure Of The Nominee Arbitrators To Reach A Consensus: Delhi High Court
Referral Court Has Duty To Conclusively Decide Issue Of ‘Existence & Validity Of Arbitration Agreement’ Raised At Pre-Referral Stage : Supreme Court
Commercial Court Cannot Be Regarded As A "Person Or Institution" Under Section 11(6) Of The A&C Act: Bombay High Court
Party Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator U/S 11(6) Must Demonstrate Failure By Other Party In Following Procedure: J&K&L High Court
Exclusive Jurisdiction Is Good For Civil Suits, Can't Supersede The Seat Of Arbitration: Jharkhand High Court
Remedy Under RERA Act Is Not A Bar For Initiation Of Arbitration: Delhi High Court
Section 11(6A) Arbitration Act Does Not Prevent Courts From Considering Issue Of Arbitrability : Supreme Court
Order Passed By The Arbitrator Allowing Meetings As Per Convenience Of Parties, Would Not Change The Seat Of Arbitration: Delhi High Court
Registrar Of The Jharkhand Cooperative Society, Who Also Is The Ex-Officio Director Of The Respondent, Jharkhand High Court Says Appointment As Arbitrator Not Barred As Parties Had Agreed Earlier
Application Under Section 11(6) Not Maintainable For Appointment Of Arbitrator In Absence Of A Written Agreement Between Parties: Supreme Court