Home
Lawyers & Law Firms
NRI Law
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Law Firms
Deal News
Law Firm Articles
Foreign Law Firms
Internships
Job Updates
Law Firm Events
SC Judgments
लाइव लॉ हिंदी
Law Schools
Call for Papers
Competitions
Interviews
Law School - Columns
Law School Articles
Moot Courts
News
School Admission
Seminars
Internships
Diploma/Certificate...
LLM/Phd
Law School Admission
Law School Cover Story
Law School Editors Pick
Placements
Scholarships/Fellowships
Top Corner Stories
IBC News
Tax
Arbitration
Events Corner
Sponsored
Top Stories
News Updates
Columns
Interviews
Foreign/International
RTI
Know the Law
Law Schools
Law Firms
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Events Corner
Videos
Sponsored
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Round Ups
IBC News
Environmental Law
Cartoons
Tax
Arbitration
Consumer Cases
X
Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Sec 438 CrPC"
Impermissible To Apply For Bail In Parts, Accused Must Seek Bail In All Offences For Which He Is Wanted: Allahabad High Court
Can Seek Anticipatory Bail Even Before Filing Of FIR If Reasonable Apprehension Of Being Arrested Is Present: Allahabad HC
Restrictive Interpretation To Section 438 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure
Anticipatory Bail Plea On Behalf Of Proclaimed Offender Not Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Economic Offences: No Embargo Under CGST Act Restraining Pre-Arrest Bail, Says Delhi High Court
Anticipatory Bail Plea Not Maintainable If Accused Already In Custody In Another Criminal Case For Similar/ Different Offences: Rajasthan High Court
Section 438(4) CrPC- Grant Accused Three Days Interim Protection From Arrest After Rejection of Anticipatory Bail: Bombay High Court
"No Express Bar Of Application Of Anticipatory Bail Under Sec. 438 CrPC To Children In Conflict With Law Under JJ Act": Gujarat High Court
Breaking- Triple Talaq-No Complete Bar On Anticipatory Bail For Offence Under 2019 Act, Provided Court Hear Complainant Woman: Supreme Court
Rejection Of Anticipatory Bail Not a Ground For Not Entertaining Petition For Quashing Of The FIR: Allahabad High Court