Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Pension Rules"

Pension Or Retiral Benefits Of Govt Employee Can Only Be Withheld When Cognizance Is Taken On Police Report Before Retirement: MP High Court
Pension Can Be Claimed Only When It Is Permissible Under Relevant Rules : Supreme Court
Payment Of Gratuity Act, 1972 Has An Overriding Effect On CCS Pension Rules, 1972: Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi
Absence After Expiry Of Authorised Leave Is 'Non-Duty' For All Purposes Other Than Pension: Kerala HC Upholds Order Setting Aside Promotion
Erring Officials To Be Held Accountable For Payment Of Cost "From Their Own Pockets" For Unnecessary Delay In Retiral Claims: Rajasthan High Court
Option To Continue With Old Pension Scheme Must Be Extended To All Persons Who Participated In Selection Prior To April 01, 2003 : Madras High Court
J&K Road Transport Corporation Employees Not Entitled To Pensionary Benefits: High Court
High Court Sets Aside Bihar Secretariat's Order Withholding Employee's 100% Pension Pending Disciplinary Action, Imposes ₹1 Lakh Cost
Pension & Other Retiral Benefit Rules Have To Be Interpreted Liberally: Meghalaya High Court
Assam Rifles Rules | State Cannot Prematurely Retire Officers Without Following Due Procedure: Gauhati High Court
Employees Can't Seek Condonation Of Interruption In Service For "Enhancing" Pension: Bombay High Court
Family Of Person Employed In Regular Work-Charged Establishment, Cannot Be Deprived Of Pension Which It Would Be Entitled By Virtue Of Mp Pension Rules, 1979: Madhya Pradesh High Court