Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 (‘NI Act’)"

Mere Initiation Of Proceedings Under IBC Doesn't Bar Liability Of Signatory Of Cheque Under Negotiable Instruments Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Section 148 NI Act - Deposit Of Minimum 20% Amount Is Not An Absolute Rule; Can Be Relaxed If Exceptional Case Is Made Out: Supreme Court
Wanton Arraignment Of Directors In Cheque Dishonour Cases, Without Reference To Their Role, Requires To Be Deprecated & Discouraged: Delhi High Court
[NI Act] Complainant Putting Date On Cheque Without Drawer's Consent Renders Instrument Void: Bombay High Court
[S.143 NI Act] Failure To Record Summary Nature Of Proceedings In Order Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Shown: Karnataka High Court
[S.311 CrPC] Statement Made In Cross-Examination Alone Cannot Be Basis To Recall Witnesses: Bombay High Court
[S.138 NI Act] Person In Charge Of Trust Can't Be Arraigned As Accused Without Impleading The Trust Itself: Orissa High Court
Offence U/S138 NI Act Not Attracted If The Cheque Is Given As Security for a Loan From Unlicensed Money Lender: Bombay High Court
Cash Transaction Exceeding Rs. 20K Does Not Nullify The Transaction In S.138 NI Act Case: Karnataka High Court
NI Act | Complainant Can't Seek To Prosecute Company's Former Directors For Cheque Issued To Repay Amount Invested When They Held Office: Karnataka HC
Complainant U/S 138 NI Act May Not Know Exact Role Of Company Directors, Basic Averment About Vicarious Liability Sufficient: Karnataka High Court
[Cheque Dishonour] Accused Must Raise 'Probable Defence' To Rebut Presumption U/S 139 NI Act & Meet The 'Test Of Proportionality': Calcutta HC