Home
Lawyers & Law Firms
NRI Law
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Law Firms
Deal News
Law Firm Articles
Foreign Law Firms
Internships
Job Updates
Law Firm Events
SC Judgments
लाइव लॉ हिंदी
Law Schools
Call for Papers
Competitions
Interviews
Law School - Columns
Law School Articles
Moot Courts
News
School Admission
Seminars
Internships
Diploma/Certificate...
LLM/Phd
Law School Admission
Law School Cover Story
Law School Editors Pick
Placements
Scholarships/Fellowships
Top Corner Stories
IBC News
Tax
Arbitration
Events Corner
Sponsored
Top Stories
News Updates
Columns
Interviews
Foreign/International
RTI
Know the Law
Law Schools
Law Firms
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Events Corner
Videos
Sponsored
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Round Ups
IBC News
Environmental Law
Cartoons
Tax
Arbitration
Consumer Cases
X
Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "NCLAT New Delhi"
Limitation U/S 61 Of IBC Is To Be Calculated From Date Of E-Filing, Rules Prevalent When Application Is Considered To Be Applied: NCLAT New Delhi
Assignee Stepping Into Shoes Of Assignor, Borrower Or Guarantor Cannot Challenge Such Assignment: NCLAT New Delhi
Adjudicating Authority Can Extend Time Limit Of PPIRP Beyond 120 Days: NCLAT New Delhi
No Inherent Right To Withdraw Section 9 IBC Application And Refile: NCLAT New Delhi
NCLAT: Assignment Agreement By Corporate Debtor, Malafide Exercise To Prolong CIRP.
NCLAT Upholds Adani Goodhomes Bid With 93% Haircut For Radius Estate
NCLAT New Delhi: When CoC Hasn't Confirmed Appointment Of IRP, IRP Can Be Replaced By CoC U/S 22 Of IBC
NCLAT New Delhi: Liquidator Is Entitled To His Fee Under S. 34 Of IBC And Regulation 4 Of Liquidation Regulations And Cost Under Regulation 2B Of Liquidation Regulations
NCLAT New Delhi: Liquidator Is Not Entitled To Charge Fee From Scheme Proponent Submitting Scheme Under S.230 Of The Companies Act
NCLAT New Delhi: Inter-Corporate Deposit In A Joint Venture Can't Be Construed As A 'Financial Debt' Under IBC
NCLAT New Delhi: Barter Agreements Don't Constitute 'Operational Debt'
NCLAT New Delhi: Workers' Claim Through Sub-Contractor Can't Be Treated On Par With Corporate Debtor's Workmen
< Prev Page
Next Page >