Home
Lawyers & Law Firms
NRI Law
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Law Firms
Deal News
Law Firm Articles
Foreign Law Firms
Internships
Job Updates
Law Firm Events
SC Judgments
लाइव लॉ हिंदी
Law Schools
Call for Papers
Competitions
Interviews
Law School - Columns
Law School Articles
Moot Courts
News
School Admission
Seminars
Internships
Diploma/Certificate...
LLM/Phd
Law School Admission
Law School Cover Story
Law School Editors Pick
Placements
Scholarships/Fellowships
Top Corner Stories
IBC News
Tax
Arbitration
Events Corner
Sponsored
Top Stories
News Updates
Columns
Interviews
Foreign/International
RTI
Know the Law
Law Schools
Law Firms
Job Updates
Book Reviews
Events Corner
Videos
Sponsored
Contact Us
Advertise with Us
Round Ups
IBC News
Environmental Law
Cartoons
Tax
Arbitration
Consumer Cases
X
Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "NCLAT Delhi"
NCLAT Delhi: Scope Of Enquiry By The Adjudicating Authority Under Section 31 Is Confined To Section 30(4) Compliance
NCLAT Delhi: Refusal To Rehear A Matter After Reserving An Order In A Company Petition Does Not Result In A Miscarriage Of Justice
Requirement Of Minimum 100 Allottees Under Section 7 To Be Met At The Date Of Filing, Subsequent Settlement By Allottees Inconsequential: NCLAT Delhi
CIRP Under Section 7 Can Commence Even If Claims Of Certain Allottees Are Time Barred Or Below Threshold Of Rs. 1 Crore: NCLAT Delhi
Section 7 Petition Seeking ‘Joint’ CIRP Of Separate Corporate Entities Involved In Common Real Estate Project Is Maintainable: NCLAT Delhi
NCLAT Delhi: Doctrine Of Promissory Estoppel Can’t Be Applied Against An Approved Resolution Plan
Appellants Who Filed Their Claims As Real Estate Allottees Are A Part Of Home Buyers And Cannot Ask Refund Separately: NCLAT Delhi
In Absence Of Rental Agreement Between Parties, RP Can’t Demand Payment Of Usage Charges For Corporate Debtor’s Machine; NCLAT Delhi
NCLAT Delhi: Appellants Who Filed Their Claims As Real Estate Allottees Are A Part Of Home Buyers And Cannot Ask Refund Separately
NCLAT Delhi: Claims Cannot Be Entertained After Approval Of Resolution Plan By CoC Even If Resolution Plan Is Still Pending For Approval By NCLT
NCLAT Delhi: Fine For Non-Cooperation By Ex-Management Under IBC Is A “Penalty” Not “Cost” And Outside NCLT’s Jurisdiction
Mere Statement Of Operational Creditor That No Dispute Exists, Is Not Enough : NCLAT Delhi
< Prev Page
Next Page >