Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "justice dinesh kumar sharma"

[Arbitration Act] Mere Sending of Notice Under Section 21 Not Enough, Receipt of Notice Essential: Delhi High Court
[Arbitration Act] Section 29A Allows Extension Requests Even After Arbitrator's Mandate Expires: Delhi High Court
Where Arbitration Seat Is Fixed, Only Such Court Shall Have Exclusive Jurisdiction To Entertain Application Under Section 11 Of Arbitration Act: Delhi High Court
Notice Under Section 21 Of Arbitration Act Is Pre-Requisite For Initiation Of Proceedings Under Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act: Delhi High Court
Court Can Not Mechanically Send Dispute To Arbitral Tribunal, Must Consider Fundamental Issues u/s 11(6A): Delhi High Court
Dispute Resolution Clauses Have To Be Read In Pragmatic Manner And Not In Manner That Frustrates Purpose: Delhi High Court
While Court's Jurisdiction Is Limited At The Time Of Making A Reference, It Is Not Expected To Mechanically Refer Dispute To Arbitration: Delhi High Court
Arbitration Act | Court Should Refrain From Delving Into Hyper-Technical Aspects Of Arbitration Agreement At Section 11(6) Stage: Delhi High Court
Mere Registration Of Criminal Case In Relation To An Agreement Would Not Make The Disputes Arising Out Of It Non-Arbitrable: Delhi High Court
Condonation Of Delay Re- Filing S. 34, A&C Act Application Must Be Allowed If Delay Is Procedural And Curable: Delhi High Court
Panel Consisting Of 23 Names Cannot Be Considered Broad-Based If It Lacks Arbitrators From Different Backgrounds: Delhi High Court
No Privity Of Contract Between Parties, not party to MOU: Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 11(4) A&C Petition