Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Industrial Disputes Act"

Predominant Function Of Undertakings Performing Several Functions Must Be Considered For Determination Of Status As 'Industry' Under ID Act: Delhi High Court
Personal Services Lacking Commercial Activity Do Not Qualify As Industrial Work For Purposes Of Industrial Disputes Act: Gujarat High Court
Once Termination Of Workman Is Declared Illegal, Remedy Is Limited To Either Reinstatement Or Lumpsum Compensation: Gujarat High Court
Upon Attaining Permanency Daily-Wage Workmen Must Be Treated On Equal Footing With Regularly Appointed Workmen: Gujarat High Court
ID Act |Right To Claim Interest Is Pre-Existing Right Only If Explicitly Provided In Contract Of Employment Or Service Conditions: Karnataka High Court
Labour Court's Orders Can't Be Executed Via Writ Before High Court, Workman Must Approach Labour Court First: Uttarakhand High Court
Industrial Disputes Act Inapplicability Of Sections 25F And 25N If Workman Fails To Work Continuously For One Year: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Writ Petition
Disputes About Promotion And Seniority Fall Within Definition Of 'Industrial Disputes', Labour Court Has Jurisdiction To Adjudicate: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Reinstatement With Back Wages Is Not Automatic Even In Cases Of Illegal Termination, Courts Might Provide Lumpsum Compensation: Gujarat High Court
Individuals Involved In Manual Work Are Considered Workmen Under ID Act, In Absence Of Direct Oversight Over Subordinates In Supervisory Role: Bombay High Court
Industrial Disputes Act Time Consumed In Proceedings At Forum Lacking Jurisdiction Is Excluded From Limitation Period: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Discontinuation Of Establishment's Work Charge Status Does Not Disentitle Workmen From Attaining Work Charge Status: Himachal Pradesh High Court