Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Industrial Disputes Act 1947"

Labour Court's Factual Finding Shouldn't Be Normally Disturbed By Writ Court Without Compelling Reason : Supreme Court
Employee In Supervisory Capacity, Drawing Wages Exceeding 10k Per Month Not 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act: Supreme Court
Complaint U/s.29 Of Industrial Disputes Act Must Contain Specific Pleadings Regarding Breach: Supreme Court
[MRTU & PULP Act] Working Journalists' Status Distinct From Regular Workmen Due To Special Privileges, Can't Be Considered Employees: Bombay HC
“Possible Unemployment Of Workers No Ground To Continue Business”: Bombay HC Allows General Motors To Close Plant Over ₹9656 Crore Loss
Bombay High Court Grants Compensation To BATA Salesmen Fired For Opposing Showrooms Opening 7 Days A Week With Extended Hours
Dispute Under Apprentices Act 1961 Cannot Be Treated As 'Industrial Dispute': Rajasthan High Court
Industrial Disputes Act | Employer's Failure To Assign Work To Employee Deemed Retrenchment: Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Tribunal Failed To Consider Roles & Responsibilities: Bombay High Court Holds Abbott's Business Manager Not 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act
Repealing Act Of 2016 Does Not Remove Section 2A(2) Of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Calcutta High Court
S.25F ID Act Not Complied: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Says Acceptance Of Compensation Won't Estop Workmen From Challenging Retrenchment
Madras High Court Restraints TANGEDCO Employees From Going On Strike, Says Essential Services Will Be Affected