Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Consumer Protection Act"

A Mere Deviation From Normal Professional Practice Is Not Necessarily Evidence Of Negligence; Reiterates NCDRC
In Medical Negligence Case, NCDRC Finds Hospital And Doctors Liable
Jurisdiction Under Article 227 And Orders Of The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ;A Snapshot
Multi Regulator Approach To Misleading Advertisements
Insurer Should Indemnify If Insured Suffers Sudden Sickness Or Ailment Which Is Not Expressly Excluded Under The Policy: Supreme Court
Consumer Case Not Maintainable Over Medical Services Given Free Of Charge Just Because Doctor Draws Salary From Hospital : Supreme Court
BREAKING : Conflicting Judgments On Prospective Application Of Ruling On Delay Condonation For Version In Consumer Cases - Supreme Court Refers To Larger Bench
NCDRC Can Direct Deposit Of Entire Or More Than 50% Of Amount Determined By SCDRC For Stay : Supreme Court
Whether Persons Booking Office Space Are Precluded From Availing Of The Benefit Under The Consumer Protection Act, 1986? Supreme Court To Decide
Consumer Protection Act 2019 : Can NCDRC Direct Deposit Of 50% Of Amount Determined By State Commission For Appeal Under Section 51? Supreme Court To Examine
Why Has NCDRC Muted Technology?
Vehicle Manufacturer Cannot Be Held Liable For Deficiency In Service By Dealer/Authorized Service Centre In Repair : Supreme Court