Stories with the ‘ tag ‘ you searched for "Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996"

Pre Deposit Of 75% Of Awarded Amount As Per Section 19 MSMED Act Is Mandatory To Challenge The Award : Supreme Court
'Requisition Of Record From Arbitral Tribunal Not Akin To Remanding Matter': Madhya Pradesh High Court
Occupier Of Flat Entitled To Transit Rent For Period Of Dispossession During Redevelopment : Bombay High Court
Arbitrator's Fees : If There Are HC Rules, They Should Apply; 4th Schedule Can Be A Default Provision, Supreme Court Says During Hearing
Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside Merely On The Ground Of Erroneous Application Of Law Or Misappreciation Of Evidence : Supreme Court
Arbitrator's Fee : Claim & Counter-Claim Have To Be Bundled Up Together, With Rs.30 lakhs Ceiling, Says Supreme Court During Hearing
Applications For Appointment Of Arbitrator Should Be Decided And Disposed At The Earliest:Supreme Court
Blanket Forbearance From Modifying An Arbitral Award – How Far Justiciable?
Condition Of Pre-Deposit U/S 19 MSME Act Mandatory, Prevails Over Exemption To Govt Under Order XXVII Rule 8A CPC: Allahabad High Court
Arbitrators Fixing Their Own Fee Would Amount To Misconduct; PSUs Can't Meet Exorbitant Fee Demand As They Are Answerable To CAG : Attorney General Tells Supreme Court
Application Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator Cannot Be Moved Before A High Court If No Part Of Cause Of Action Arose Within Its Territorial Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
Can Arbitrators Fix Their Fee Without Parties' Consent? Is 4th Schedule The Standard Fee Scale? Supreme Court Considers