Tax Cases Weekly Round-Up: 9 July To 15 July, 2023

Update: 2023-07-18 02:30 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
story

Supreme Court Revenue Dept Can't Recover Refunded Cess Amount Because Refund Was Based On A Judgment Which Was Later Overruled : Supreme Court Case Title: Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (J and K) vs M/s Saraswati Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 522 The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Jammu and Kashmir and...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

Supreme Court

Revenue Dept Can't Recover Refunded Cess Amount Because Refund Was Based On A Judgment Which Was Later Overruled : Supreme Court

Case Title: Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise (J and K) vs M/s Saraswati Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

Citation : 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 522

The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (J&K&L) High Court where the court had held that the assessee was not liable to return the Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess in view of the law subsequently laid down by the Supreme Court in M/s Unicorn Industries vs. Union of India, (2020) 3 SCC 492.

Delhi High Court

MSMED Act Would Not Be Applicable To CA Firms Appointed As ‘Special Auditors’ Under Section 142(2A) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961: Delhi High Court

Case Title: PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. MSECF and Anr, W.P.(C) 13754 of 2019

Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 568

The Delhi High Court has held that the provisions of MSMED Act, 2006 would not apply to a CA firm appointed as ‘Special Auditor’ under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act (IT Act), 1961.

Subsidy Received By Nestle India As Incentive To Establish Industrial Unit Is Capital Receipt: Delhi High Court

Case Title: Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Nestle India Ltd

Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 572

The Delhi High Court observed that the Subsidy received by Nestle India, the assessee as incentive to establish industrial unit is Capital receipt and cannot be adjusted against block of assets.

Knowledge Is A Necessary Element For Committing Abetment : Delhi High Court Quashes Penalty Against Customs Broker

Case Title: Rajeev Khatri Versus Commissioner Of Customs (Export)

The Delhi High Court has quashed the penalty against customs brokers on the grounds that knowledge is a necessary element for committing abetment.

Bombay High Court

No Material Available To Conclude Income Had Escaped Assessment: Bombay HC Quashes Income Tax Notice

Case Title: Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

The Bombay High Court has provided relief to the Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited by quashing the notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The court observed a lack of tangible material to support the conclusion that income had escaped assessment, thereby prohibiting any further steps by the tax authorities regarding the notice.

Bombay High Court Declares Notices And Proceedings Under Income Tax Act For Deceased Assessee As Null And Void

Cause Title: Dhirendra Bhupendra Sanghvi v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

While emphasizing that if the concerned officers followed the settled law and refrained from issuing null and void notices, it would be beneficial not only for the citizens but also for the already overburdened courts in the country, the Bombay High Court ruled that all notices and consequential proceedings under the Income Tax Act in the name of a deceased assessee were null and void.

State GST Dept. Doesn’t Have Jurisdiction To Retain Amount Of Tax On Export Transactions: Bombay High Court

Case Title: Media Net Software Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India & Ors.

The Bombay High Court has held that CGST/MGST authorities would not have jurisdiction to retain the amount of tax on export transactions.

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat High Court Directs To Release Seized Gold As Outstanding Demand Against Assessee

Case Title: Praveenbhai Girdharilal Agarwal Versus Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)

The Gujarat High Court has directed the department to release the 100.350 grams of seized gold as the assessee had no outstanding demand.

Gujarat High Court Grants Assessee Permission to Pay Tax Liability in Installments, Lifts Bank Account Attachment

Case Title: Nirajkumar Nareshkumar Lakhyani (Pro. Of M/S Om Multitrade) Vs. State Of Gujarat

The Gujarat High Court has overturned the decision of the Adjudicating Authority and granted permission to an assessee to fulfill their tax liability through installment payments, consequently lifting the provisional attachment of the assessee’s bank account.

Gujarat High Court Quashes Non-Speaking Cryptic Order Of GST Registration Cancellation

Case Title: Om Trading Vs State Of Gujarat R/Special Civil Application No. 8990 Of 2023

The Gujarat High Court has clarified that an order for the cancellation of registration passed without providing any reasons is a non-speaking order and therefore is liable to be set aside.

Allahabad High Court

No Notice For GST Recovery Issued Against The Applicant, Was Illegally Arrested: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail

Case Title: Ravinder Nath Sharma vs. UOI [Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 26376 Of 2023]

Case Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (AB) 213

The Allahabad High Court has granted bail on the grounds that no notice for GST recovery was issued against the applicant, who was illegally arrested.

Patna High Court

No Penalty Under Section 129(3) Of CGST Act Could Be Imposed Without Providing A Hearing Opportunity U/S 129(4) Of The Act

While observing that a petitioner’s response to the show cause is required to be considered after due opportunity of hearing, in accordance with the statutory provisions, the Patna High Court has overturned the penalty imposed on a petitioner for moving goods without a valid e-way bill.

ITAT

Capital Gain Exemption Allowable On Construction Of Residential House Completed Within 3 Years: ITAT

Case Title Hemant Shridhar Phatak Vs. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), has held that the claim of capital gain exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on construction of residential house completed within 3 years is allowed and removed the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.

Payment Made For Acquiring Membership In A Social Club Can’t Be Allowed As Business Expenditure: ITAT

Case Title: BalrajsinghJagjitsingh Versus ADIT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has observed that payments made for acquiring membership in a social club could not be allowed as business expenditure when there was no evidence to prove that membership in the social club was acquired for entertaining customers by the assessee.

Foreign Assignment Allowance Received For The Services Rendered Outside India Can’t Be Taxed In India: ITAT

Case Title: Tadimarri Prasanth Reddy Versus ITO

The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that foreign assignment allowance received by the assessee for services rendered outside India could not be taxed in India.

Business Model Explains Mismatch Between Form 26AS And Actual Income: ITAT

Case Title: DCIT Versus M/s Connect Residuary Pvt. Ltd.

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition on the grounds that the business model explains the mismatch between Form 26AS and actual income.

Bank Guarantee Rates Cannot Be Considered For Benchmarking Corporate Guarantee Fee: ITAT

Case Title: Crayon Group AS Versus ACIT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that bank guarantee rates cannot be considered for benchmarking corporate guarantee fees.

ITAT Disallows Interest Paid On Loan Taken For Paying Compensation To Family Members Pursuant To Arbitral Award On Family Settlement

Case Title: Sanjay Atchut Poy Raiturcar Versus ITO

The Panaji Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has disallowed the interest paid on a loan that was taken for paying compensation to the assessee’s family members pursuant to an arbitral award on family settlement.

CESTAT

Central Excise Commissioner Can Direct The Deputy Commissioner To Appeal Before The Commissioner (Appeals): CESTAT

Case Title: M/s. Gannon Dunkerly & Co.Ltd. Versus Commissioner of CGST & CX, Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate

The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the Central Excise Commissioner can direct the Deputy Commissioner to appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals).

No Excise Duty Payable On Waste Or Rubbish, Which Is Thrown Up In The Course Of Manufacture: CESTAT

Case Title: JSW Steel Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Waste or rubbish that is thrown up in the course of manufacture cannot be said to be a product of manufacture and cannot be subject to excise duty.

Ranger And Brutus Vehicles Imported By Polaris India Are Not Designed For Transportation Of Persons: CESTAT

Case Title: Polaris India Private Limited Versus Principal Commissioner of Customs

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Ranger and Brutus Vehicles imported by Polaris India are not designed for the transportation of persons.

AAR

GST Payable On Services Of Loading And Unloading Of Imported Unprocessed “Toor” And “Whole Pulses” And “Black Matpe”: West Bengal AAR

Applicant’s Name: Sona Ship Management Private Ltd

The West Bengal Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that GST is payable on services of loading and unloading of imported unprocessed "toor" "whole pulses" and "black matpe".

No Separate GST Registration Required For Each Type Of Business Services Carried From The Same Place Of Business: West Bengal AAR

Applicant’s Name: Aesthetik Engineers Private Limited

The West Bengal Authority of Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that no separate registration is required for each type of business, i.e., manufacturing, reselling, or providing services carried on from the same place of business.


Tags:    

Similar News