Punjab & Haryana HC Sets Aside Order Striking Off Wife's Defence In Divorce Case, Deters Hyper-Technical Approach In Matrimonial Litigation
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has reiterated that Courts must adopt a practical approach while dealing with matrimonial litigation, instead of approaching the case in a hyper-technical manner. This is because matrimonial disputes ultimately affect families and human relationships.The remarks were made while setting aside a Family Court order which struck off wife's defence in a...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has reiterated that Courts must adopt a practical approach while dealing with matrimonial litigation, instead of approaching the case in a hyper-technical manner. This is because matrimonial disputes ultimately affect families and human relationships.
The remarks were made while setting aside a Family Court order which struck off wife's defence in a divorce case, without providing adequate opportunity. Justice Harkesh Manuja said,
"In the matrimonial litigation, the dispute is primarily relating to the human relationship, which ultimately not only affects the two families but the society at large as well and thus, the standard of strict applicability of the procedure needs to be avoided and instead of adopting hyper-technical approach, the courts are required to be more practical while dealing with such kind of litigation."
The petitioner-wife had appeared before the Family Court on 26.04.2022 and had sought time for filing of written statement to the divorce petition as well as to file reply to application for grant of interim custody of the minor child. On the next date, she sought further time for the purpose of filing written statement and reply to application, but the same could not be done and on the next date fixed thereafter, the Family Court ordered for striking off her defence.
From a perusal of zimni orders, the High Court observed that the petitioner-wife was never afforded sufficient and adequate opportunity to file her written statement. "Non-granting of adequate and sufficient opportunity to petitioner-wife for the purpose of filing of her written statement would cause substantial prejudice to her rights, involving her matrimonial dispute, including the custody of the minor child," it said.
Accordingly, the Court directed the Family Court to grant one "effective opportunity" to the petitioner to file her written statement as well as reply to the application for grant of interim custody of the minor child.
Case Title: Simrit Gulani v. Anil Gulani
Citation: CR-5664-2022 (O&M)
Coram: Justice Harkesh Manuja
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (PH) 323
Click Here To Read/Download the Order