Nominal Index: ESHWAR R & others v KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 348POULAMI BASU v. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 349M Chiranjeevi v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 350HARISH A.S. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 351S.R. Ravi v. Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 352DANDELI BACHAO ANDOLAN SAMITHI v STATE...
Nominal Index:
ESHWAR R & others v KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 348
POULAMI BASU v. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 349
M Chiranjeevi v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 350
HARISH A.S. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 351
S.R. Ravi v. Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 352
DANDELI BACHAO ANDOLAN SAMITHI v STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 353
Abraham T.J v B.S. Yediyurappa & Others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 354
AJ v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 355
M.MANJULA v STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 356
Judgments/Orders
Case Title: ESHWAR R & others v KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY
Case NO: WRIT PETITION No.15429 OF 2022
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 348
The Karnataka High Court has directed the Karnataka Examinations Authority to redo the CET rankings for admission to undergraduate courses in Engineering and Technology for the academic year 2022-23.
Case Title: POULAMI BASU v. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Case NO: WRIT PETITION NO.14716 OF 2022
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 349
The Karnataka High Court has said that once exclusive custody of a child is granted by the Family Court to a mother, the Regional Passport Officer is not justified in insisting upon the presence of the father of the ward or for his consent for issuing a passport to the child.
Case Title: M Chiranjeevi v. State of Karnataka
Case No: WP NO 46302 of 2018
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 350
The Karnataka High Court has observed that ordinarily, Writ Courts do not grant indulgence in matters involving contract and non-payment of contractors' bills, more particularly when disputed facts are involved. Aggrieved parties can work out their remedies by an ordinary civil suit or by invoking arbitration clause, if there be one.
State Legislators Not Disqualified From Holding Posts In Committees, Society: Karnataka High Court
Case Title: HARISH A.S. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case No: W.P. NO.18278 OF 2021 C/W W.P. NO.19421 OF 2021
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 351
The Karnataka High Court has held that a Member of the State Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council is not disqualified from holding the post of Chairman of any Committee or of any society.
Case Title: S.R. Ravi v. Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation, Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 180 of 2020
Citation :2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 352
The Karnataka High Court has held that the words "statements of claim and defence" under Section 7(4)(c) of the A&C Act are to be given wider interpretation and reply to a notice of arbitration falls within the section.
Case Title: DANDELI BACHAO ANDOLAN SAMITHI v STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case No: W.P. NO.16505 OF 2007
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 353
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a public interest litigation filed by Dandeli Bachao Andolan Samithi, challenging the State's decision to part with water resources of Kali river and permit commercial use by a sugar mill.
Karnataka High Court Restores Bribery Complaint Against Former CM Yediyurappa
Case Title: Abraham T.J v B.S. Yediyurappa & Others
Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION No.5659/2021
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 354
The Karnataka High Court has restored a bribery complaint filed against former Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa, his son B.Y. Vijayendra and others alleging offences under Prevention of Corruption Act.
Case Title: AJ v. State of Karnataka
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 355
The Karnataka High Court on Friday allowed a petition filed by a minor boy and set aside the investigation initiated against him under sections of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) for allegedly sexually assaulting a minor girl, following a mutual settlement having arrived at between the parties.
Case Title: M.MANJULA v STATE OF KARNATAKA
Case No: WRIT PETITION No.7784 OF 2022
Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 356
The Karnataka High Court has held that a Magistrate court cannot direct further investigation by some other investigation agency after rejecting the B report (closure report) filed by a probe agency that was appointed by the High Court.