Gujarat HC Issues Notice In PIL Filed By Mahatma Gandhi's Great Grandson Against Sabarmati Ashram Revamp Plan

Update: 2022-06-16 07:37 GMT
story

The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday issued a notice to the State Government and others in public interest litigation (PIL) by Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, who is opposing the Gujarat government's decision to revamp/redevelop the Sabarmati Ashram in Ahmedabad at the estimated cost of ₹1,200-crore.The bench of Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J. Shastri...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday issued a notice to the State Government and others in public interest litigation (PIL) by Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, who is opposing the Gujarat government's decision to revamp/redevelop the Sabarmati Ashram in Ahmedabad at the estimated cost of ₹1,200-crore.

The bench of Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J. Shastri also issued notice to the National Gandhi Smarak Nidhi, Khadi Gramodyog Prayog Samiti, Harijan Ashram Trust, Sabarmati Ashram Gaushala Trust, Sabarmati Ashram Preservation Memorial Trust (SAPMT), Sabarmati Riverfront Development Corporation Ltd and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC).

It may be noted that Gandhi had moved the instant petition before the HC last year challenging the proposed redevelopment. It is his case that the redevelopment plan os diametrically opposed to the personal wishes and bequeathal of Mahatma Gandhi and would reduce the shrine and memorial of India's freedom movement, and turn the same into a commercial tourist attraction.

He has expressed his fear that the project will change the physical structure of Sabarmati Ashram and corrupt its pristine simplicity that embodies the ideology of Gandhiji.

Further, he has also expressed his apprehension stating that with the nature of redevelopment and over-sized involvement of the government authorities in the conception and execution of the project, the ashram may lose the Gandhian ethos.

However, in November last year, the Gujarat High Court had disposed of this plea observing that all the fears and apprehensions of Gandhi stood allayed in the Order of the Government itself.

The High Court through the impugned order had also refused to quash the Government Resolution dated 05.03.2021 issued by the Industries and Mines Department, Gujarat forming Governing and Executive Council for the purpose of comprehensive development of the Gandhi Ashram Memorial.

Challenging that very order, Gandhi had moved to the Apex Court, and in April 2022, the Top Court had sent back to the Gujarat High Court, the petition by Gandhi observing that the HC should not have summarily dismissed the petition.

Essentially, a bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and Surya Kant had observed that it would have been appropriate for the High Court to decide on the issue raised instead of dismissing the petition summarily. Allowing Gandhi's appeal, the Court set aside the Gujarat High Court's judgment and restored the matter to the High Court for a decision on the merits.

The Court had also clarified that it had not expressed anything on the merits of the matter and that all contentions are left open.  Now, on Tuesday, the High Court issued notices to the aforementioned authorities and listed the matter for further hearing on July 7, 2022.

Tags:    

Similar News