Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Election Commission On Plea For Regulation Of Internal Elections In Political Parties
The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Election Commission of India on a PIL seeking regulatory oversight of internal elections in political parties. The Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh has asked the EC to file its counter affidavit in the matter, to be next heard on December 23. The petition has been filed by Advocate C. Rajashekaran. He...
The Delhi High Court has issued notice to the Election Commission of India on a PIL seeking regulatory oversight of internal elections in political parties.
The Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh has asked the EC to file its counter affidavit in the matter, to be next heard on December 23.
The petition has been filed by Advocate C. Rajashekaran. He was represented by Advocates Abhimanyu Tewari and Aatrayi Das.
Earlier, the High Court had disposed the plea directing the Commission to treat it as a representation. The Petitioner had highlighted that, provisions relating to the organisational elections were not being followed by the political parties.
Now, aggrieved by the Commission's response that no specific action is required in the matter, the Petitioner has again moved the High Court on the following grounds:
Democracy is a crucial aspect of the basic structure of the constitution. However,
"One of the most crucial actors in the electoral process, namely political parties, continue to remain outside the regulatory ambit of the Election Commission of India with respect to intra-party democracy."
It is also pointed out that recognised political parties gain unique advantages, including distinctive election symbols, grant of infrastructure etc. and derive their funding from the common citizenry and interest groups.
Thus, it is argued that political parties are repositories of the public's faith, making intra-party democracy extremely crucial.
Reliance is placed on Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India, where the Supreme Court had recognized that Parliamentary democracy and multi-party system are an inherent part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.
"Lack of intra-party democracy in said political parties to leadership positions within the said parties results in a unique situation where there is no mechanism for said political party to be held accountable to its members and its own constitution," the plea states.
It is submitted that although most political parties provide for elections through the provisions, said elections are often an eyewash for established political families within the said parties to continue to retain power as the top leadership of said party.
On statutory powers, it is submitted,
"Democratic functioning of political parties is a fundamental prerequisite to ensure true allegiance to the Constitution, and to meaningfully enforce the declaration mandated under Section 29-A (5) of the Representation of People's Act, 1951."
It is further pointed out that the Election Commission has authority under Article 324 of the Constitution, of superintendence and control for preparation of electoral rolls for elections to State Legislatures and the Parliament.
Advocate Suruchi Suri appeared for the Election Commission.
Case Title: C. Rajashekaran v. Election Commission of India