Delhi High Court Seeks Enforcement Directorate's Response On Plea By Popular Front Of India Challenging Money Laundering Case

Update: 2021-12-09 04:13 GMT
story

The Delhi High Court has sought the response of the Enforcement Directorate on a plea filed by Popular Front of India (PFI) challenging a money laundering case registered against it in the year 2018. Issuing notice on the plea, Justice Anu Malhotra granted four weeks time to the agency for filing it's response and posted the matter for further hearing on February 4. The Court also added that...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Delhi High Court has sought the response of the Enforcement Directorate on a plea filed by Popular Front of India (PFI) challenging a money laundering case registered against it in the year 2018.

Issuing notice on the plea, Justice Anu Malhotra granted four weeks time to the agency for filing it's response and posted the matter for further hearing on February 4.

The Court also added that it was expected that the cctv cameras of the agency will remain functional at the time of recording of the statements.

Appearing on behalf of PFI, Advocate Adit Pujari apprised the Court that the matter was registered by the Enforcement Directorate out of a case registered by the National Investigation Agency which concerned the alleged training of youngsters in Kerala for carrying out anti national activities.

Pujari also apprised the Court that according to the NIA, in the year 2013, some bricks and lathis were found in a meeting for the purpose of the said meeting.

The Trial Court had convicted some persons for the offences under IPC, Explosives Act and UAPA. However, in appeal, the High Court had dropped the UAPA offences saying there were no anti national activities.

Pujari therefore argued that in light of High Court's opinion, there was no reason for the Enforcement Directorate to proceed against the petitioner.

He also stated that as many as 150 summons have been received by PFI's members so far across the Country and claimed it to be a "roving and fishing inquiry" by the agency.

He submitted that the agency was not following the directions issued by the Apex Court regarding installation of cctv cameras at the place of interrogation.

On the other hand, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate, Amit Mahajan stated that the agency was complying with the said directions "in letter and spirit".

The matter will now be heard on February 4, 2022.

Title: PFI v. ED

Tags:    

Similar News