Actor Assault Case | Prosecution Submits Audio Clips Before Kerala High Court, Seeks More Time To Wind Up Further Probe
The prosecution has submitted a pendrive before the Kerala High Court while seeking more time to conclude the further investigation in the 2017 sexual assault case. The pendrive includes two folders containing three voice clips each which were apparently collected by the investigating officers during the course of further investigation. The prosecution has submitted that the said clips are...
The prosecution has submitted a pendrive before the Kerala High Court while seeking more time to conclude the further investigation in the 2017 sexual assault case.
The pendrive includes two folders containing three voice clips each which were apparently collected by the investigating officers during the course of further investigation.
The prosecution has submitted that the said clips are highly necessary for proper adjudication of the case to satisfy the Court of the necessity to extend the time frame to complete the further investigation.
In 2017, a popular actress was abducted and raped in a moving vehicle pursuant to a conspiracy, allegedly plotted by Dileep. Being the 8th accused in the case, he is now undergoing trial before the CBI Special Judge.
The case made headlines once again in 2022 when film director Balachandrakumar made shocking disclosures against the actor bringing out new allegations against him. Once these allegations came to light, the prosecution sought more time from the court to wind up its probe citing that a further investigation was necessary in light of the new disclosures.
In the petition filed before the High Court, he had alleged that furtherance of this 'sham investigation' infringes the right of a fair trial and added that it is an abuse of the process of law.
Dileep had accused the case to be a 'deliberate and calculated attempt' of the prosecution to sabotage the trial before the Special CBI Court. He has further pointed out that the impugned report containing new information was submitted by the Investigating Officer on 29th December 2021, the exact date when the Officer was scheduled to be examined as the last witness for the prosecution at the trial court.
However, dismissing the plea, the Court ruled that Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not restrict the investigating agency from conducting a further probe into a crime when it is notified of new information. The Single Judge added that Dileep had failed to establish any grounds to quash the further investigation.
Holding so, the Single Judge permitted the investigating agency to carry on with the further investigation. Nevertheless, it was directed that such investigation shall be completed and the further report be filed no later than April 15.
Seeking an extension of this time frame stipulated by the Court, the prosecution has produced the audio files to exhibit the gravity of the new allegations.