Home >  IBC News >  NCLAT Stays The...

NCLAT Stays The Constitution Of Committee Of Creditors Of Supertech Limited

By - Akshay Sharma
Update: 2022-04-12 05:53 GMT
story

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT) Principal Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Dr. Alok Srivastava(Member Technical) and Ms.Shreesha Meerla (Member Technical) stays the constitution of committee of creditors and adjourned the appeal preferred by suspended director of Supertech Limited against the order dated 25.03.2022 of NCLT New Delhi which initiated the...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Subscribe Now

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT) Principal Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Dr. Alok Srivastava(Member Technical) and Ms.Shreesha Meerla  (Member Technical) stays the constitution of committee of creditors and adjourned the appeal preferred by suspended director of Supertech Limited against the order dated 25.03.2022 of NCLT New Delhi which initiated the CIRP against Supertech Limited to 19.04.2022.

Senior Advocate Arun Kathpalia appeared for the suspended director of Supertech limited and submitted that corporate have 30 ongoing projects and default has occurred only qua one project. He further submitted that the settlement project is pending consideration with the financial creditor Union Bank of India.
Senior Advocate P Nagesh appeared for a homebuyer association and submitted that they are not in favour of CIRP of their project.
It was further prayed that the Resolution Professional shall not constitute Committee of Creditors till the next date of hearing since the bank is still considering the settlement proposal by Supertech Limited.
Union Bank of India submitted that the settlement project of Supertech limited was rejected by the bank yesterday.
The appeal is now posted for hearing on 19.04.2022.
Case Title: Ram Kishor Arora Suspended Director of Supertech Ltd. Vs.Union Bank of India & Anr
Case No: Comp. App. (AT)(Ins) No. 406 of 2022
Tags:    

Similar News

Corporate Debtor's Property Cannot Be Recovered By Owner/Lessor During Moratorium Period U/S 14 Of IBC: NCLAT

Any Amount Proposed In Settlement Plan U/S 12A Of IBC Cannot Be Refunded If Plan Is Approved: NCLAT

Directors Of Financial Creditors Not Disqualified From Filing Plea U/S 7 Of IBC Due To Sister Company's Default U/S 248 Of Companies Act: NCLAT

Adjudicating Authority Cannot Enter Into Merits At S. 95 Application Stage Before Report Of RP Is Submitted U/S 99 Of IBC: NCLAT

Banking Companies Not Required To Exhaust MSME Revival Option Before Filing Petition U/S 7 Of IBC: NCLT, Mumbai

IBC Weekly Digest: 4th November To 10th November 2024

Extinguishment Of Promoters' Personal Guarantees In Resolution Plan Is Valid If Plan Complies With IBC Provisions: NCLT Mumbai

Timely Implementation Of Resolution Plan Is Crucial To Achieve IBC's Objective Of Protecting Assets Dissipation: Supreme Court

IBBI Releases Discussion Paper On Real Estate Issues, Suggests Inclusion Of Land Authorities In CoC Meetings

Filing Petition U/S 94 Of IBC By Guarantor Through RP Does Not Preclude Financial Creditors From Seeking Replacement Of RP: NCLAT

Liquidator's Reliance On Transaction Audit Report Sufficient To File Application For Avoidance Of Preferential Transactions U/S 43 Of IBC: NCLAT

Security Deposit In Lease Agreement If Repayable Without Any Interest Cannot Be Classified As Financial Debt U/S 5(8) Of IBC: NCLAT