Home >  IBC News >  NCLAT Stays The...

NCLAT Stays The Constitution Of Committee Of Creditors Of Supertech Limited

By - Akshay Sharma
Update: 2022-04-12 05:53 GMT
story

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT) Principal Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Dr. Alok Srivastava(Member Technical) and Ms.Shreesha Meerla (Member Technical) stays the constitution of committee of creditors and adjourned the appeal preferred by suspended director of Supertech Limited against the order dated 25.03.2022 of NCLT New Delhi which initiated the...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Subscribe Now

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT) Principal Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Dr. Alok Srivastava(Member Technical) and Ms.Shreesha Meerla  (Member Technical) stays the constitution of committee of creditors and adjourned the appeal preferred by suspended director of Supertech Limited against the order dated 25.03.2022 of NCLT New Delhi which initiated the CIRP against Supertech Limited to 19.04.2022.

Senior Advocate Arun Kathpalia appeared for the suspended director of Supertech limited and submitted that corporate have 30 ongoing projects and default has occurred only qua one project. He further submitted that the settlement project is pending consideration with the financial creditor Union Bank of India.
Senior Advocate P Nagesh appeared for a homebuyer association and submitted that they are not in favour of CIRP of their project.
It was further prayed that the Resolution Professional shall not constitute Committee of Creditors till the next date of hearing since the bank is still considering the settlement proposal by Supertech Limited.
Union Bank of India submitted that the settlement project of Supertech limited was rejected by the bank yesterday.
The appeal is now posted for hearing on 19.04.2022.
Case Title: Ram Kishor Arora Suspended Director of Supertech Ltd. Vs.Union Bank of India & Anr
Case No: Comp. App. (AT)(Ins) No. 406 of 2022
Tags:    

Similar News

Once CoC Approves Resolution Plan Then No Claim Is To Be Entertained: NCLAT

CIRP Withdrawal Cannot Be Allowed Unless Application Is Filed By Applicant Who Initiates Section 7 Application: NCLAT

CIRP Withdrawal Cannot Be Allowed Unless Application Is Filed By Applicant Who Initiates S.7 Application: NCLAT

NBCC To Lead Completion Of Supertech's Stalled Projects, Securing Homebuyers' Rights

IBC | Moratorium Does Not Extinguish Claim : Supreme Court

Non Impleadment Of Owner As Party By Liquidator In Application U/S 19 Of IBC Not Malafide If Ownership Was Uncertain: NCLAT

IBC | Financial Creditor Can Submit Claim Even If There Is No Default Of Debt : Supreme Court

Resolution Plan Approved By CoC Binds All Stakeholders Including Dissenting Financial Creditor: NCLAT

Date Of Default In Case Of Personal Guarantor Depends On Terms Of Contract Of Guarantee: NCLAT

Non-Admission Of Claim By Resolution Professional Cannot Be Challenged First Time In Appeal Before Appellate Tribunal: NCLAT

CIRP Can't Be Extended Beyond 330 Days U/S. 12(3) Of IBC Absence Of “Exceptional Circumstances”: NCLAT

Copy Of Other Prospective Resolution Applicants' Plans Cannot Be Shared When Suspended Management Is Also A Resolution Applicant: NCLAT