Breaking: Karnataka High Court Dismisses "Politically Motivated" PIL Seeking Action Against State BJP Leaders For Alleged Hate Speeches

Update: 2024-07-09 06:29 GMT
Click the Play button to listen to article
trueasdfstory

The Karnataka High Court today dismissed a PIL filed by a civil contractor, seeking action against several state BJP leaders including MP Renukacharya, CT Ravi, Tejasvi Surya and Prathap Simha for allegedly making Hate speeches.Petitioner Mohammed Khaleeulla claimed he came across the alleged speeches through social media platforms.However, division bench headed by Chief Justice NV Anjaria...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

The Karnataka High Court today dismissed a PIL filed by a civil contractor, seeking action against several state BJP leaders including MP Renukacharya, CT Ravi, Tejasvi Surya and Prathap Simha for allegedly making Hate speeches.

Petitioner Mohammed Khaleeulla claimed he came across the alleged speeches through social media platforms.

However, division bench headed by Chief Justice NV Anjaria found the allegations were too general, lacking authentication and said the PIL appeared to be "politically motivated".

"Why are you misusing the platform of High Court by filing such petitions? Why are you wasting time of courts by filing such petitions with omnibus prayers?" the Judge sternly remarked while dismissing the plea.

The Petitioner had relied on the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in respect of hate speeches in 'Tehseen Poonawalla' case.

Court said filing of petition smacks motive other than public interest and petition of this nature cannot be entertained as PIL.

Petitioner had also sought a direction on the government to broadcast on TV, radio and other media platforms and official websites of the State Home department and Police stating that hate speech, mob violence and mob lynching shall invite serious consequences.

Further, a direction was prayed to the government to take up suo-moto action and register cases against individuals who allegedly make hate speeches, creating enmity between two communities. The plea also sought designated court in each district to try hate speeches and lynching cases on a day to day basis and conclude the trial within 6 months from the date of cognizance, as is stated in the Apex court guidelines. 

Full View
Tags:    

Similar News