Junagadh Flogging: Gujarat High Court Issues Notice To State Govt, Seeks Reply By July 17

While referring to certain videos of the alleged brutal public flogging of citizens of India belonging to the minority community by Junagadh Police, the PIL plea has stated thus:

"Such police brutality of punishing citizens of India without any due process of law and without a competent court holding them guilty is the worst form of human rights violation by the law and enforcement agency itself. Even if the victims of police brutality are held guilty by a competent court, the punishment of public flogging in independent India is alien and unknown to the criminal justice system...Such kind of punishment is held by the Apex Court as being colonial, archaic, barbaric and most inhumane punishment unknown to the civilized world that destroys not only the character of a victim but tarnishes the image of a nation that runs on the Rule of Law and not its exceptions."

The PIL plea further states that the persons who were mercilessly flogged were produced before the JMFC as accused at a very belated juncture. The very victims were detained first as suspects/accused in the police station without any treatment after public flogging and they were not provided with any medical treatment.

"The victims were so much tortured mentally and physically that they could not utter a word when they were produced before the Ld. JMFC in response to a formal question as to whether the police ill-treated the victims after their arrest till they were produced before the Ld. Court. The victims have been remanded to police custody. After the arrest of the victims, the Junagadh police has visited their homes and caused havoc besides ransacking the house from within," the PIL plea says

The PIL plea also submits that at least six juveniles were also arrested by the Police and were subjected to custodial violence and torture and they even submitted written complaints in writing before the magistrate court, however, the said complaints were withdrawn after the parents of the juvenile were approached by the Junagadh Police.

"Incidentally, the Ld. JMFC did not inquire into the circumstances for withdrawn and ascertained the genuineness of such application. Moreover, the Ld. JMFC did not make any effort to find out whether such a withdrawal application has been made, in the case of juveniles and others, out of free volition or under the threat and coercion by Junagadh police. This aspect requires inquiry and investigation," the plea states.