Difficulties Faced By Visually Impaired In Identifying New Rs. 50 And Rs. 200 Notes: Delhi HC Seeks Senior Advocate S.K. Rungta's Assistance On PILs [Read Order]

Update: 2018-02-26 09:34 GMT
story

 The Delhi High Court has sought Senior Advocate S.K. Rungta's assistance on Petitions alleging that the new Rs. 50 notes do not have the requisite markings to enable their identification by visually impaired people.In an order passed on 16 February, the Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar also directed Mr. George Abraham, CEO of Score Foundation,...

Your free access to Live Law has expired
Please Subscribe for unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments, Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.

 The Delhi High Court has sought Senior Advocate S.K. Rungta's assistance on Petitions alleging that the new Rs. 50 notes do not have the requisite markings to enable their identification by visually impaired people.

In an order passed on 16 February, the Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar also directed Mr. George Abraham, CEO of Score Foundation, a non-profit that works for the visually impaired, to assist it along with Mr. Rungta, who is visually impaired from birth.

The Court further granted a week's time to the Centre to file an affidavit differentiating between different coins that have been issued or are supposed to be issued.

The Court is hearing Petitions filed by three Advocates- Rohit Dandriyal, Rahul Kumar, Kumar Vivek and Amritanshu Barthwal, one Company Secretary- Rahul Kumar and NGO, All India Confederation of Blind.

The Petitions have submitted that the RBI had introduced a special feature in Intaglio on all notes except those for Rs. 10. For instance, Rs. 20 note has vertical rectangles, while Rs. 50 notes used to have squares. This feature, it says, helps the visually impaired to identify the denomination and the copies of the same.

It has, however, been alleged that the new notes do not contain any such identification sign.   This, it says, violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India, contending, "It is very difficult for visually impaired person to identify the New Note. This act of respondents violated the constitutional right of visually impaired persons, which is confirmed by article 14 of The Constitution India."

Hearing the Petitions, the Court had, on 31 January, issued notice to the Centre and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The matter has now been listed on 7 March.

Read the Order Here

Full View

Similar News